Talk:Prima scriptura: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
==Cleanup== |
==Cleanup== |
||
There are a number of items that should be done here. First, which denominations or theologians advocate this doctrine? (looking at the creator's orther edits, I'd guess it's at least an Adventist formulation.) Second, I don't think the article fairly represents ''sola scriptura''. Many Protestants who believe the former do value tradition (especially for help interpreting the Bible) and would more accurately fit under ''prima scriptura''. The only ones who wouldn't qualify would be radical Anabaptists, fundamentalists, etc., who actually reject tradition ("No creed but Christ" and all that). In what sense is tradition secondary to the Bible in ''prima scriptura''? Third, the Roman Catholic view is caricatured unfairly, methinks. Their doctrine is not as fixed as it may appear from a distance. Just some thoughts. --[[User:Flex|Flex]] 15:42, July 19, 2005 (UTC) |
There are a number of items that should be done here. First, which denominations or theologians advocate this doctrine? (looking at the creator's orther edits, I'd guess it's at least an Adventist formulation.) Second, I don't think the article fairly represents ''sola scriptura''. Many Protestants who believe the former do value tradition (especially for help interpreting the Bible) and would more accurately fit under ''prima scriptura''. The only ones who wouldn't qualify would be radical Anabaptists, fundamentalists, etc., who actually reject tradition ("No creed but Christ" and all that). In what sense is tradition secondary to the Bible in ''prima scriptura''? Third, the Roman Catholic view is caricatured unfairly, methinks. Their doctrine is not as fixed as it may appear from a distance. Just some thoughts. --[[User:Flex|Flex]] 15:42, July 19, 2005 (UTC) |
||
:I agree. I wandered upon this page accidentally, and clearly it needs some work. [[User:KHM03|KHM03]] 15:57, 19 July 2005 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 15:57, 19 July 2005
Cleanup
There are a number of items that should be done here. First, which denominations or theologians advocate this doctrine? (looking at the creator's orther edits, I'd guess it's at least an Adventist formulation.) Second, I don't think the article fairly represents sola scriptura. Many Protestants who believe the former do value tradition (especially for help interpreting the Bible) and would more accurately fit under prima scriptura. The only ones who wouldn't qualify would be radical Anabaptists, fundamentalists, etc., who actually reject tradition ("No creed but Christ" and all that). In what sense is tradition secondary to the Bible in prima scriptura? Third, the Roman Catholic view is caricatured unfairly, methinks. Their doctrine is not as fixed as it may appear from a distance. Just some thoughts. --Flex 15:42, July 19, 2005 (UTC)
- I agree. I wandered upon this page accidentally, and clearly it needs some work. KHM03 15:57, 19 July 2005 (UTC)