Energy amplifier: Difference between revisions
remove some of the information until references are provided |
|||
Line 21: | Line 21: | ||
* Inherent safety and safe fuel transport could make the technology more suitable for developing countries. |
* Inherent safety and safe fuel transport could make the technology more suitable for developing countries. |
||
== |
==Principle and feasibility== |
||
The energy amplifier uses a [[synchrotron]] accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce [[neutron]]s through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile [[Uranium|uranium-233]], an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy. |
The energy amplifier uses a [[synchrotron]] accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce [[neutron]]s through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile [[Uranium|uranium-233]], an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy. |
Revision as of 18:44, 19 July 2005
In nuclear physics, an energy amplifier is a novel type of nuclear power reactor, a subcritical reactor, in which an energetic particle beam is used to stimulate a reaction, which in turn releases enough energy to power the particle accelerator and leave an energy profit for power generation.
History
The concept is credited to Carlo Rubbia, a nuclear physicist and former director of Europe's CERN international nuclear physics lab. He published a proposal for a power reactor based on a proton cyclotron accelerator with a beam energy of 800 MeV to 1 GeV, and a fuel/moderator target with thorium as fuel and lead as a moderator.
Advantages
The concept has several potential advantages over conventional nuclear fission reactors:
- Subcritical design means that the reaction could not run away — if anything went wrong, the reaction would stops and the reactor would cool down. A meltdown could however occur if the refrigeration of the core were lost.
- Thorium is an abundant element — much more so than uranium — reducing strategic and political supply issues and eliminating costly isotope separation. There is enough thorium to generate energy for thousands of years at current consumption rates.
- Less long-lived radioactive waste is produced — most of the waste would decay after 500 years to the level of coal ash. The amplifier could actually be used to transform long-lived waste (like plutonium) from conventional reactors into safer substances.
- No new science is required; the technologies to build the energy amplifier have all been demonstrated in the laboratory. Building an energy amplifier requires only some engineering effort, not fundamental research (unlike nuclear fusion proposals).
- Power generation might be economical compared to current nuclear reactor designs if the total fuel cycle and decommissioning costs are considered.
- Inherent safety and safe fuel transport could make the technology more suitable for developing countries.
Principle and feasibility
The energy amplifier uses a synchrotron accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce neutrons through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile uranium-233, an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy.
This design looks promising but needs more studies until it can be claimed practical and economical.