User talk:72.187.112.172: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
Undid revision 192926466 by 72.187.112.172 (talk) |
||
Line 19: | Line 19: | ||
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THE CORE OR MANTLE EXISTS...JUST THEORIES. WE HAVE NOT DUG 400 MILLION MILES SO THERE IS NO PROOF. I USED A FEW CUSS WORDS IN THE DISCUSSION SECTION AND I GOT BANNED...WHAT A SITE!|decline=It would clearly not be in Wikipedia's best interests to allow you to edit at this time. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 00:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)}} |
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THE CORE OR MANTLE EXISTS...JUST THEORIES. WE HAVE NOT DUG 400 MILLION MILES SO THERE IS NO PROOF. I USED A FEW CUSS WORDS IN THE DISCUSSION SECTION AND I GOT BANNED...WHAT A SITE!|decline=It would clearly not be in Wikipedia's best interests to allow you to edit at this time. — [[User:Yamla|Yamla]] ([[User talk:Yamla|talk]]) 00:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)}} |
||
FUCK YOU MOTHAFUCKA!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! I WILL BE UNBANNED MOTHAFUCKA!!!!! |
Revision as of 00:27, 21 February 2008
February 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Scarlett Johansson, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. скоморохъ 01:38, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Scarlett Johansson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. скоморохъ 01:49, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Please do not vandalize pages, as you did with this edit to User talk:Catgut. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. - Milk's Favorite Cookie 01:51, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to User talk:Skomorokh, you will be blocked from editing. скоморохъ 01:52, 19 February 2008 (UTC)
- If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
—slakr\ talk / 23:34, 20 February 2008 (UTC)
fraud
72.187.112.172 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
I SHOULDN'T BE BANNED!!!!!
THERE IS NO PROOF THAT THE CORE OR MANTLE EXISTS...JUST THEORIES. WE HAVE NOT DUG 400 MILLION MILES SO THERE IS NO PROOF. I USED A FEW CUSS WORDS IN THE DISCUSSION SECTION AND I GOT BANNED...WHAT A SITE!
Decline reason:
It would clearly not be in Wikipedia's best interests to allow you to edit at this time. — Yamla (talk) 00:16, 21 February 2008 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.