Talk:Concrete category: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Geometry guy (talk | contribs) Update class/comments using AWB |
Boy Waffle (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
}} |
}} |
||
I have given this article a major overhaul. Previously, it contained one major factual inaccuracy (the assertion that '''Rel''' can not be concretized), unprofessional language ("roughly speaking", "in everyday life"), and failed to address several key issues such as the overlap between "abstract" and "concrete". I will expand section 5 after I have found some more references. [[User:Boy Waffle|Boy Waffle]] ([[User talk:Boy Waffle|talk]]) 18:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Are there any categories which do not allow a faithful functor into Set? |
|||
: Sure, tons of them. But are they "natural"? [[User:Phys|Phys]] 22:18, 15 Nov 2003 (UTC) |
|||
::Ask an algebraic topologist. [[User:Revolver|Revolver]] 10:08, 27 Apr 2005 (UTC) |
Revision as of 18:44, 22 February 2008
Mathematics Start‑class Low‑priority | ||||||||||
|
I have given this article a major overhaul. Previously, it contained one major factual inaccuracy (the assertion that Rel can not be concretized), unprofessional language ("roughly speaking", "in everyday life"), and failed to address several key issues such as the overlap between "abstract" and "concrete". I will expand section 5 after I have found some more references. Boy Waffle (talk) 18:44, 22 February 2008 (UTC)