Talk:Sleaford: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 12:05, 24 February 2008

This article has not yet been rated on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
It is of interest to the following WikiProjects:

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

UK geography B‑class Mid‑importance

	United Kingdom portal This article falls within the scope of WikiProject UK geography, a user-group dedicated to building a comprehensive and quality guide to places in the United Kingdom on Wikipedia. If you wish to participate, share ideas or merely get tips you can join us at the project page where there are resources, to do lists and guidelines on how to write about settlements.UK geographyWikipedia:WikiProject UK geographyTemplate:WikiProject UK geographyUK geography articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.
Mid	This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the project's importance scale.

Please add the quality rating to the {{WikiProject banner shell}} template instead of this project banner. See WP:PIQA for details.

Cities B‑class

	Cities portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Cities, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of cities, towns and various other settlements on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.CitiesWikipedia:WikiProject CitiesTemplate:WikiProject CitiesWikiProject Cities articles
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Considered for deletion??

I cannot believe that the wikifascists are considering this for deletion! Yet there it is, a banner declaring such, at the top of the page, dated June 2007. A classic example of why people no longer bother with creating great wikipedia pages like this one. (Anon 23:32, 2nd Aug 2007.

Post Dissolution Landowners

Quote:

"From 1556 the ownership of the town and its lands passed from the church to local absentee landowners."

Question:

Were they local or were they absentees? (RJP 13:44, 16 October 2005 (UTC))[reply]

Rename?

Should we rename Sleaford to Sleaford, Lincolnshire as that is what Wikipedia Naming Conventions dictates. --Jh fireboy I'm listening 08:32, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

No they don't. We'd only have it at Sleaford, Lincolnshire if there were other important Sleafords, which there aren't even any other ones. Morwen - Talk 08:33, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

There is another Sleaford in Hampshire. --Jh fireboy I'm listening 08:45, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ah. Ok, then we need to make a diambiguation link to it because it isn't a big one. I shall do this. Morwen - Talk 09:01, 27 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

true?

"These three schools feed a unique joint sixth-form consortium (pictured below).Even though the school has had many good ofsted reports many of the students come out depressed and dont get good grades There are also the nurseries. They are Redcroft Day Nursery, Woodside Children's Nursey, Happy Day Nursery and Sleaford Day Nursery."

Is there any references for this?

Do we not need some mention about the close of flicks nightclub? 91.104.11.207 (talk) 12:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 12:05, 24 February 2008 edit 91.104.11.207 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 12:05, 24 February 2008 edit undo 91.104.11.207 (talk) No edit summary Next edit →
Line 32:		Line 32:


	Do we not need some mention about the close of flicks nightclub?		Do we not need some mention about the close of flicks nightclub? [[Special:Contributions/91.104.11.207\|91.104.11.207]] ([[User talk:91.104.11.207\|talk]]) 12:05, 24 February 2008 (UTC)