Jump to content

Talk:Alive 2007: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
James599 (talk | contribs)
Line 62: Line 62:
I removed this review, because it's very badly written. Scroll down and read the comments below it; the users definitely agree.
I removed this review, because it's very badly written. Scroll down and read the comments below it; the users definitely agree.
--[[User:James599|James599]] ([[User talk:James599|talk]]) 01:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
--[[User:James599|James599]] ([[User talk:James599|talk]]) 01:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

== pads ==
i am taking out the "two Lemur pads" part where it says "The four Voyager units, two Behringer mixers and two Lemur pads allowed Daft Punk to "mix, shuffle, trigger loops, filter, distort samples, EQ in and out, transpose or destroy and deconstruct synth lines". the screens have nothing to do with mixing, shuffling, filtering, etc. just the moogs and behringers. [[Special:Contributions/66.25.12.225|66.25.12.225]] ([[User talk:66.25.12.225|talk]]) 23:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 23:53, 2 March 2008

WikiProject iconAlbums Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is within the scope of WikiProject Albums, an attempt at building a useful resource on recordings from a variety of genres. If you would like to participate, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

Pre-Order?

Does anyone have any idea if there is a way to pre-prder a copy? If so, please post a link on this entry, thanks alot! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zincyams (talkcontribs) 17:46, 2 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Leak

Guys, please stop edit warring. Firstly, the WP:ALBUM style guideline is just that ... a guideline, without hard-and-fast rules. Secondly, things don't need to perfect right now ... we can wait, or at least engage in discussion. Ixlikextoxdansex, one concern raised is that the information is unsourced. Where did you find out that the album was leaked? --Iamunknown 01:31, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It's possible that the "leak" is being confused with an amateur bootleg recording of a live show. A cited source independent of download sites is especially needed in this case. Just64helpin 01:45, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
No, stating the album has been leaked is not needed AT ALL per WP:ALBUM#Leak. Douglasr007 01:54, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I'm not suggesting that it be immediately added if a reliable, published source is found. I'm explaining why it was removed in the first place, and why it is potentially inaccurate. Just64helpin 02:01, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]
... is WP:ALBUM#Leak or is it not a guideline? If so, it is, as "guidelines" are described in the "Policies and guidelines" policy, "...not set in stone and should be treated with common sense and the occasional exception." Right now might be a good time to have an exception... --Iamunknown 02:44, 21 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

it is not leaked the leak is of the 2006 concertOhnoes09 21:35, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

That still needs a source, though. Just64helpin 21:43, 3 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
Regardless of sources, I purchased Alive 2007 recently, and it is definitely different to the bootleg I downloaded before the release date. 203.213.232.123 (talk) 01:11, 16 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Confusing

is this a 2007 concert or 2006 one? saying "The Alive 2007 performance is an expansion of Daft Punk's 2006 live set." makes it sound like its the 2006 concert.--Neckbelowup 22:16, 7 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Alive 2007 tour on its on is an update to what the 2006 tour was. The 2007 tour includes tweaks and the encore. Douglasr007 22:38, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I believe I've clarified this in my editing. Just64helpin 22:42, 8 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Unknown track/sample

Does anyone know what the sample or track is at 0:30 on track four, "Too Long" / "Steam Machine"? It's been driving me mad. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Milkclub (talkcontribs) 22:40, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

If I'm following the question correctly, that would be the vocal from "Too Long" mixed with new material. Just64helpin (talk) 23:00, 19 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

one long track

is the album just one track, like alive 97?--24.109.218.172 (talk) 21:11, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

All signs point to "no". Just64helpin (talk) 21:59, 20 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

It has seperate tracks but it's a gapless album. Jonfin826 (talk) 11:10, 21 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Booklet?

My copy, and my friends copy contained no 50 image booklet. Where is this hidden booklet, and did it exist at all? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 58.178.89.227 (talk) 06:17, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The book is included with the 2-disc special edition. Just64helpin 12:01, 2 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]
I think that the UK only got the 2cd+book version; i can only find that one on UK sites anyway (amazon.co.uk lists a 1cd, but it is "import"). Because of the fancy build of it, there arent enough to go around, and they are sold out on many sites, with third-party sellers listing them pretty expensive, or just the us 1cd.
SORRY! didnt sign above --82.71.13.254 16:20, 4 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Moog

I urge that you keep the RME (rack mount edition) part after where it says moog voyager as its useful information and is correct rather than just saying theyre using moog voyagers. thank you. 66.25.12.225 (talk) 03:58, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please cite sources for your contributions, or they may be removed. Thank you. Just64helpin (talk) 04:01, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

i did. the RME's can be seen in the photos and are explained in detail. 66.25.12.225 (talk) 04:07, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


high end comps

please site sources that say they used high end computers or it will be removed. oh and for the record every source that talks about their equipment quotes thomas saying they 'used custom made super computers'. again it will be removed it does not cite a source that truthfully states that bit of information on the article. thank you. 66.25.12.225 (talk) 04:29, 11 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]


AbsolutePunk.net Review

I removed this review, because it's very badly written. Scroll down and read the comments below it; the users definitely agree. --James599 (talk) 01:34, 27 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

pads

i am taking out the "two Lemur pads" part where it says "The four Voyager units, two Behringer mixers and two Lemur pads allowed Daft Punk to "mix, shuffle, trigger loops, filter, distort samples, EQ in and out, transpose or destroy and deconstruct synth lines". the screens have nothing to do with mixing, shuffling, filtering, etc. just the moogs and behringers. 66.25.12.225 (talk) 23:53, 2 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]