Talk:STS-114: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:50, 26 July 2005

THE SPACE SHUTTLE SUCKS. PEOPLE LISTEN TO THE TRUTH. THE SHUTTLE ARE WASTING BILLIONS OF AMERICAN TAX PAYERS DOLLAR. THEY ARE USELESS. ALL THEY CAN DO IS GO LOE (LOW EARTH ORIBT). FOR $35 BILLION DOLALRS WE CAN SEND A MANNED MISSION TO MARS. IT IS CALLED MARS DIRECRT. NASA KNOWS THIS BUT THEY RATHER WASTE MONEY.

LOOK AT HOW MUCH MONEY THEY HAVE CONSUMED. WHAT DID THEY ACHIENVE AFTER THE APOLLO MOON LANDING? NOTHING GREAT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T CARE FOR SPACE ANYMORE. SO WHY SHOULD WE WASTE MORE MONEY ON SOMETHING THAT IS A WASTE WHEN WE DON'T WANT IT.

(don't ask why i added the caps)

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+THE SPACE SHUTTLE SUCKS. PEOPLE LISTEN TO THE TRUTH. THE SHUTTLE ARE WASTING BILLIONS OF AMERICAN TAX PAYERS DOLLAR. THEY ARE USELESS. ALL THEY CAN DO IS GO LOE (LOW EARTH ORIBT). FOR $35 BILLION DOLALRS WE CAN SEND A MANNED MISSION TO MARS. IT IS CALLED MARS DIRECRT. NASA KNOWS THIS BUT THEY RATHER WASTE MONEY.
-<B>SUCCESS!</B>
-''Godspeed Discovery''
-This will likely become a popular page in the next 48 hours.  Let's try to be polite to one another, clear, complete, and accurate.  And let's be careful out there... :-)<br>--[[User:Baylink|Baylink]] 00:07, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
+LOOK AT HOW MUCH MONEY THEY HAVE CONSUMED. WHAT DID THEY ACHIENVE AFTER THE APOLLO MOON LANDING? NOTHING GREAT. THE AMERICAN PEOPLE DON'T CARE FOR SPACE ANYMORE. SO WHY SHOULD WE WASTE MORE MONEY ON SOMETHING THAT IS A WASTE WHEN WE DON'T WANT IT.
-== Launch and landing times ==
-[http://science.ksc.nasa.gov/shuttle/missions/sts-114/mission-sts-114.html NASA Mission Brief] notes landing sked for KSC.<br>--[[User:Baylink|Baylink]] 00:13, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
+(don't ask why i added the caps)
-== Cost? ==
-Anyone know the cost of building ''STS-114''? If so, please leave a message on my [[User talk:Thorpe|talk]] page. [[User:Thorpe|• Thorpe •]] 18:26, 13 July 2005 (UTC)
-== September 17, 2009  ==
-That's when they'll start flying again.
-* Very funny.  Stop [[Special:Contributions/68.91.113.252|vandalizing]] pages. —[[User:Charles O'Rourke|Charles O'Rourke]] 19:43, July 13, 2005 (UTC)
-This isn't vandalism, this is THE TRUTH!!!!!!!
-== Next launch attempt ==
-According to the press conference this afternoon, the most optimistic date for a second attempt would be Saturday.  No date has been set, tentative or otherwise.  Reference for Saturday date: http://www.nasa.gov/returntoflight/main/index.html - [[User:Cafemusique|Cafemusique]] 00:17, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
-'''Quote from that link''' (in case external page is edited):
-:NASA managers continue to analyze the issue with the Engine Cut-Off sensor on Space Shuttle Discovery's External Tank. The sensor protects an orbiter's main engines by triggering them to shut down in the event fuel runs unexpectedly low. For the moment, no new launch date for Discovery has been set. During the briefing, Space Shuttle Program Deputy Manager Wayne Hale said the most optimistic possibility for the next launch attempt could be as early as this Saturday, July 16. Additional information will be posted as it becomes available. (posted at 00;21 UTC)
-Quick update, earliest launch date now pushed back to Sunday.--[[User:Changlc|Loren]] 19:55, 14 July 2005 (UTC)
-From [http://nytimes.com/aponline/science/AP-Space-Shuttle.html?hp&ex=1121400000&en=97212ab43e8b2b12&ei=5094&partner=homepage NY Times]
-:CAPE CANAVERAL, Fla. (AP) -- NASA said Thursday that it will not make another attempt to launch space shuttle Discovery until at least Sunday -- and even that is a ''really optimistic good-luck scenario.''
-:Deputy shuttle program manager Wayne Hale said the space agency still probably faces several days of troubleshooting to figure out what caused the faulty fuel-gauge reading that forced the cancellation of Wednesday's launch attempt.
-:The only way the shuttle would be able to fly on Sunday is ''if we go in and wiggle some wires and find a loose connection,'' said Hale, who conceded that was unlikely.
-== spaceflights each crew member completed ==
-Since the current mission has not been completed these numbers appear to be off by one. Perhaps it would be better to say
-: spaceflights each crew member completed prior to this mission
-and decrement each of the numbers. [[User:Pretzelpaws|Pretzelpaws]] 18:09, 15 July 2005 (UTC)
-: I was thinking the exact same thing.  --[[User:DNordquist|DNordquist]] 17:36, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
-== delay's effect on atlantis ==
-i don't understand this part, isn't having more time to get atlantis ready a *good* thing?  I guess I don't understand the arguments listed there in the article, or it's not clear.
-== Mass ==
-Not 0 surely... [[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich Farmbrough]] 15:14, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
-== Update ==
-Can someone kindly update [[List of human spaceflights, 2000-present]] [[User:Rich Farmbrough|Rich Farmbrough]] 15:18, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
-== wikinews link needs updating ==
-the link to the wikinews article about "on indefinite hold" needs to be changed or removed.--[[User:Mitrebox|mitrebox]] 16:26, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
-+Done I pinned one to the top (with a br tag underit so that the mission infobox still floated left) and one on the 26th. I left the previous news links on the days they occured --[[User:Mitrebox|mitrebox]] 16:35, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
-:[[User:Tomf688|'''Tomf688''']]: nice work on combining the wikinews links, it looks ''much'' better like this! &ndash; [[User:QuantumEleven|QuantumEleven ]] | [[User_talk:QuantumEleven|(talk)]] 17:30, July 26, 2005 (UTC)