User talk:85.145.236.214

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Marie-Hélène Chisholm has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Will ^(talk) 20:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did in this edit to Daima Beltrán. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Thanks. Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 20:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

Please do not add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Victor Bivol. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 20:43, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

This is your last warning. You will be blocked from editing the next time you add inappropriate external links, as you did with this edit to Vitaliy Bubon. Two One Six Five Five ^τ _ʃ 20:44, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

You have been blocked for a period of 31 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. Jauerback^dude?/_dude. 20:49, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.145.236.214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Absolutely no spam! Links I added were links to video material of the SPECIFIC judokas! Relevant and contributing information!

Decline reason:

Ah, but they're all to the same website, no? Nor did you stop and discuss them when warned ... you just kept right on doing it, which is considered disruptive behavior. Maybe they might meet the external links policy ... but you can take that up with the people at the martial arts WikiProject when your block expires. — Daniel Case (talk) 21:52, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

85.145.236.214 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

One does not get a pop-up or something when a message/warning is given. I did not even notice the 'you have new messages' line, untill it was too late..

Decline reason:

The yellow new messages bar is the pop-up notification of a warning. Ignorance is not an excuse, and the block is valid. -MBK₀₀₄ 03:44, 8 March 2008 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.