Jump to content

User talk:A Raider Like Indiana: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
add
1() (talk | contribs)
March 2008: new section
Line 62: Line 62:
Thank you, A Raider Like Indiana, for the Barnstar and the kind words. :) I appreciate the recognition. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Thank you, A Raider Like Indiana, for the Barnstar and the kind words. :) I appreciate the recognition. [[User:Acalamari|Acalamari]] 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:No problem. [[User:A Raider Like Indiana|<b><font face="papyrus" color="orange">A Raider Like Indiana</font></b>]] (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
:No problem. [[User:A Raider Like Indiana|<b><font face="papyrus" color="orange">A Raider Like Indiana</font></b>]] (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

== March 2008 ==

Thank you for experimenting with {{#if:Windows 9x|the page [[:Windows 9x]] on}} Wikipedia{{#if:|&nbsp;as you did with [{{{diff}}} this edit]}}. Your test worked, and it has been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]] or removed. Please use [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|the sandbox]] for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the [[Wikipedia:Introduction|welcome page]] to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia.<!-- Template:Test (first level warning) --> [[User:1()|1()]] ([[User talk:1()|talk]]) 09:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 09:15, 9 March 2008

Welcome to my talk page! This is the best way to contact me. I will respond to all messages I receive.

I'll get back to you as soon as I can. :) - A Raider Like Indiana 16:20, 7 June 2007 (UTC) 16:39, 7 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you for your fixes to NTFS. Your corrections were entirely accurate (not always the case in that article) and it was nice to see. --Yamla 15:36, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, and thanks. User:A Raider Like Indiana 19:29, 17 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

ROTJ

Um, I'm not trying to scare you off, but there is a reason why the article has not been brought into FAC yet. It's not ready. It still needs to have it's references doubled up on and requires information on the box office performance. I'd withdraw the FAC, before we receive any oppositions as it's not going to go well. I can almost assure you of that being that I oversaw all of the other previous FACs on the Star Wars films. The Filmaker 03:34, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

  • You know what, the article does contain some box office information. Let's see if there are any complaints. The Filmaker 03:37, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]
    • I don't appreciate the fact that you are referring to the nomination as a "Self-nomination" and including the phrase "I personally edited this page to add more content to expand this article to make it better than it was originally." Considering that you don't appear to have edited the page beyond the removal of a vandal's deletion template. It is particularly rude and not very bright to take credit for another person's (or group of persons) work especially without contributing in the slightest yourself. Wikipedia is very much a tight-knit community, and your actions will not be well-regarded. I'll give you the opportunity to change the page to avoid incident. The Filmaker 03:50, 18 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

How is my version blurry? Also, what do you mean by inferior quality? It's a lossless and pixel-to-pixel accurate PNG. --tyomitch 16:54, 19 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Having received no response from you, I'm reverting the image back. --tyomitch 09:38, 23 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, it looks like I'm getting reverted by two editors, User:Warrens and User:Tyomitch on Windows 2000. Could you add your two cents to the talk page of Windows 2000? - Ta bu shi da yu 12:48, 28 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]


Big girls don't cry editing

Hi, i'm an unregistered user of wikipedia and was wondering if you could help me with a question i want you to answer. In the article, "Big girls don't cry" (a song by Fergie) the section "Chart Performance" keeps getting deleted (the text) all about the song's performance on worldwide charts. I strongly believe that that article would be a really good one with that information, but people always delete it and it is really irritating me, so if you know why please let me know. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by 220.101.48.239 (talk) 10:21, August 29, 2007 (UTC)

It needs to be shorten or rewritten. It is good, and the article should have it but; no one will read it because of its length. Try not not to go into as much detail with chart performances. A Raider Like Indiana 01:05, 30 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your sig

Hi. Your new sig is malformed (see [1]). You need to use the keyboard < and > keys and not the unicode numbers. Ask if you need a hand. -- Flyguy649 talk contribs 23:33, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your AIV report

Hey, just letting you know I've removed your report regarding 70.189.118.126 (talk · contribs) for the time being; you mentioned a dynamic IP address, but I didn't see mention of other user(s) or page(s) involved, and the particular page mentioned in the report (Glacéau) didn't seem to have tooooo much recent activity. If I'm missing something, or if you can provide some diffs that might enlighten, feel free to let me know or submit another report. This isn't a lecture by any means, just the list was getting a bit crowded and tends to move fast. ;) Thanks for your time! – Luna Santin (talk) 23:56, 1 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Rose DeWitt Bukater's date of death

Hello, A Raider Like Indiana. I'm certain that the reason that Rose's date of death was left as Unknown in that article, as well as not being specified in the Titanic article is because while a lot of (I would say most) people feel that she died at the end of that film, James Cameron stated, "It is to remain up to the viewer to decide weather Rose has passed away or is just dreaming." Therefore, we have no valid proof of when Rose died. I myself definitely feel that she died at the end of that film, just as Jack said that she would, and felt that it was/is a great foreshadowing instance in the film (as well as within all of cinema) and don't know why James Cameron wouldn't/won't just say, "Yeah, she died. It's true"...as I feel was his intention with that scene, but we cannot state that she died in 1997, when even James Cameron won't confirm it. I'm thinking you should change that back to Unknown. Flyer22 23:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I went ahead and changed it back, and, of course, replied to the message you left for me on my talk page (before I changed it back), but it's pretty much the same thing that I stated here. Anyway, I'll see you around. Flyer22 03:02, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

"Their is no SE for the prequel trilogy"

Psh. Just wait. Haha. I didn't add that and wouldn't think it's appropriate, by the way, but it wouldn't nearly surprise me if they release a "special edition" in the not-too distant future for the PT. --lincalinca 01:38, 16 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Userbox

The user box says you have over 1500 contribs. You don't even have a 1000. I checked your edit count on that tool. ThundermasterTRUC 14:45, 22 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hello A Raider Like Indiana, would you like the rollback feature added to your account? It's a tool that will help you revert vandalism more quickly. Acalamari 19:52, 18 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback granted. :) Just remember it's for vandalism-reversion only. :) For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. Good luck. Acalamari 01:19, 21 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you!

Thank you, A Raider Like Indiana, for the Barnstar and the kind words. :) I appreciate the recognition. Acalamari 02:41, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problem. A Raider Like Indiana (talk) 04:18, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Thank you for experimenting with the page Windows 9x on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. 1() (talk) 09:15, 9 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]