Talk:Fulton surface-to-air recovery system: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Looper5920 (talk | contribs) assessed |
b-class fail |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{WPMILHIST|class= |
{{WPMILHIST|class=start |
||
<!-- B-Class checklist --> |
|||
<!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |
|||
|B-Class-1= no |
|||
<!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |
|||
|B-Class-2= yes |
|||
<!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |
|||
|B-Class-3= yes |
|||
<!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |
|||
|B-Class-4= yes |
|||
<!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |
|||
|B-Class-5= yes |
|||
|US-task-force=yes}} |
|US-task-force=yes}} |
||
Revision as of 20:35, 10 March 2008
Military history: North America / United States C‑class | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Needs work
This article seems to be a more or less verbatim copy of https://www.cia.gov/csi/studies/95unclass/Leary.html, but parts of the original CIA article have been left out. Someone more familar with the copyright issues and plagarism policies of wikipedia needs to review it.
"Once it recovered, it attacked the crew."
That is a actually from the PD source article [1]. A user removed it [2], probably thinking it was vandalism, but it is apparently true.