User talk:Ioeth/Archive 5: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 13:27, 15 March 2008

This is an archive of past discussions with User:Ioeth. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

←

Bot

Sweet! - CobaltBlueTony™ _talk 16:20, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the recommendation! Ioeth _{(talk contribs friendly)} 16:23, 19 February 2008 (UTC)

Request for some action

Hello Ioeth. One friend pointed me to your person, that you would probably help me. The case is following. I added to this completely unreferenced article: All-Polish Youth some sources and User:Krzyzowiec continues to whitewash it. I asked him on the talk page - [1] - to stop removing valid references. He replied - [2] - with harsh uncivil comments, calling me "socialist" and accusing me of "communistic propaganda", for instance. Moreover, he again blanked whole my constructive contributions, see [3], calling me "left-liberal kid" etc., in edit summaries. He also blanked references in similar article - [4] - with mocking edit summary "NAnanNANa". If some anonymous IP would do this, it would be no problem to block it but this is other case, because it is registered user. Personally I think his uncivil behavior and removal of content is pure vandalism. Please, take some action. Thank you. - Darwinek (talk) 22:12, 25 February 2008 (UTC)

Help with Adminship-ness

I'm missing something. I'm at a loss regarding what to do to advance my efforts at adminship. According to Balloonman I'm obviously insufficient but I don't know why or how to correct it. Any suggestions would be most welcome. Padillah (talk) 15:21, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

Barnstar for you!

		The Original Barnstar
		Here's a barnstar for improving Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia! The Helpful One ^(Review) 22:00, 1 March 2008 (UTC)

Friendly script

For your Friendly script, does it merge a new tag that I add to existing tags on an article to create the {{article issues}} tag? If not, then I'd suggest that it does. Cheers! Gary King (talk) 02:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Pseudoscience discretionary sanctions

Hi! As somebody who commented on a January proposal to place all articles related to homeopathy on article probation, I would greatly appreciate your input on a new proposal to help combat disruption that would scrap the probation and implement discretionary sanctions. I apologize for any intrusion, but this is to my knowledge the first time sanctions of this nature have been attempted to be enforced by the community, so I feel that a wide range of opinions is necessary. Thank you in advance for any comments you may make. east718 (talk) 18:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)

@@ Line 23: / Line 23: @@
 For your Friendly script, does it merge a new tag that I add to existing tags on an article to create the <nowiki>{{article issues}}</nowiki> tag? If not, then I'd suggest that it does. Cheers! [[User:Gary King|Gary King]] ([[User talk:Gary King|talk]]) 02:53, 4 March 2008 (UTC)
+== Pseudoscience discretionary sanctions ==
+Hi! As somebody who commented on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Archive125#Article probation for Homeopathy|a January proposal]] to place all articles related to homeopathy on article probation, I would greatly appreciate your input on [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#New proposal for discretionary sanctions|a new proposal]] to help combat disruption that would scrap the probation and implement discretionary sanctions. I apologize for any intrusion, but this is to my knowledge the first time sanctions of this nature have been attempted to be enforced by the community, so I feel that a wide range of opinions is necessary. Thank you in advance for any comments you may make. [[user:east718|east718]] ([[user talk:east718|talk]]) 18:59, 7 March 2008 (UTC)