Jump to content

User talk:212.219.143.50: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
March 2008: new section
March 2008: Vandal3 warning
Line 89: Line 89:


[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:Jedi|, as you did to [[:Jedi]]}}. Your edits appeared to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Geoffr|Geoff Riley]] ([[User talk:Geoffr|talk]]) 14:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
[[Image:Information.svg|25px]] Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia{{#if:Jedi|, as you did to [[:Jedi]]}}. Your edits appeared to constitute [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalism]] and have been [[Help:Reverting|reverted]]. If you would like to experiment, please use the [[Wikipedia:Sandbox|sandbox]]. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|Thank you.}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism2 --> [[User:Geoffr|Geoff Riley]] ([[User talk:Geoffr|talk]]) 14:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

[[Image:Nuvola apps important.svg|25px]] Please stop. If you continue to [[Wikipedia:Vandalism|vandalize]] Wikipedia{{#if:Jedi|, as you did to [[:Jedi]]}}, you will be [[Wikipedia:Blocking policy|blocked]] from editing. {{#if:|{{{2}}}|}}<!-- Template:uw-vandalism3 --> [[User:Geoffr|Geoff Riley]] ([[User talk:Geoffr|talk]]) 14:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)

Revision as of 14:36, 17 March 2008

Please do not replace Wikipedia pages with blank content. Blank pages are harmful to Wikipedia because they have a tendency to confuse readers. If it is a duplicate article, please redirect it to an appropriate existing page. If the page has been vandalised, please revert it to the last legitimate version. If you feel that the content of a page is inappropriate, please edit the page and replace it with appropriate content. If you believe there is no hope for the page, please see the deletion policy for how to proceed. Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia! Doc ask? 10:45, 23 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Community college. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. - Tangotango 14:34, 22 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Sexual attraction, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. - CobaltBlueTony 12:58, 3 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Bauhaus

Your recent edit to Bauhaus (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // Tawkerbot4 07:25, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Tim Burton

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. --Draicone 07:59, 5 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit for Dir en grey

Who is Charlotte "Luna" Mackman? Please give me legitimate proof of who she is and if that actually is Kyo's girlfriend. If you can't, it will be pronounced as vandalism.

-AKnot

Your edit to Robert Blandford

Your recent edit to Robert Blandford (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 13:51, 18 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Batman

Your recent edit to Batman (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:21, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to phenol

Thank you for experimenting with the page phenol on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. --Dirk Beetstra T C 10:58, 20 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Cricklade College

Your recent edit to Cricklade College (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:16, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Cricklade College. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:15, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Carboxylic acid, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 10:31, 26 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism, and if you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. --Hroðulf (or Hrothulf) (Talk) 12:33, 3 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Computational tree logic (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 09:12, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning for editing Liverpool F.C. (diff). The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. // AntiVandalBot 09:19, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Liverpool F.C.

Your recent edit to Liverpool F.C. (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 08:24, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. – Ian Cairns 12:09, 7 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

You have been temporarily blocked from editing for vandalism of Wikipedia. If you wish to make useful contributions, you may do so after the block expires.

Slambo (Speak) 12:12, 8 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Computer software

Your recent edit to Computer software (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 11:42, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Computer software on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. Kind Regards - Heligoland | Talk | Contribs 11:43, 15 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Aircraft marshalling (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // AntiVandalBot 10:52, 17 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

January 2007

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick 10:31, 10 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, as you did to ARCNET, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. thunderboltz(Deepu) 13:12, 16 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]


You have been temporarily blocked from editing Wikipedia as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our neutral point of view policy will not be tolerated. Chris Griswold () 10:03, 30 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for experimenting with the page Wide area network on Wikipedia. Your test worked, and it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any other tests you may want to do. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. A link to the edit I have reverted can be found here: link. If you believe this edit should not have been reverted, please contact me. RyanPostlethwaiteSee the mess I've created or let's have banter 15:44, 5 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to Thomas Weelkes. It is considered vandalism, which under Wikipedia policy, can lead to blocking of editing privileges. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. --RobertGtalk 12:19, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Thomas Weelkes

Your recent edit to Thomas Weelkes (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 12:29, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of about six weeks in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for repeated abuse of editing privileges. Please stop. You're welcome to make useful contributions after the block expires. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below. RobertGtalk 12:51, 16 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edit to Claude Debussy (diff) was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to recognize and repair vandalism to Wikipedia articles. If the bot reverted a legitimate edit, please accept my humble creator's apologies – if you bring it to the attention of the bot's owner, we may be able to improve its behavior. Click here for frequently asked questions about the bot and this warning. // MartinBot 08:21, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy due to persistent vandalism originating from your proxy server or network. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

-SpuriousQ (talk) 08:29, 6 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 6 months as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our polices concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated. —DerHexer (Talk) 13:45, 17 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

March 2008

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Jedi. Your edits appeared to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Geoff Riley (talk) 14:29, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Jedi, you will be blocked from editing. Geoff Riley (talk) 14:36, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]