Talk:Kenneth Woollcombe: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
class |
→Merge Kenneth John Woollcombe: yes and no |
||
Line 11: | Line 11: | ||
Was this resolved? -- [[User:Secisek|Secisek]] ([[User talk:Secisek|talk]]) 21:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC) |
Was this resolved? -- [[User:Secisek|Secisek]] ([[User talk:Secisek|talk]]) 21:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC) |
||
:I merged the material in myself, but I think we need an admin to effect the page move. -- [[User:One pound|One pound]] ([[User talk:One pound|talk]]) 00:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 00:22, 22 March 2008
Anglicanism Start‑class Low‑importance | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Kenneth Woollcombe appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 19 March 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March. |
Merge Kenneth John Woollcombe
Yes I agree Bashereyre (talk) 14:06, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
- Two points:
- The article that I started at Kenneth Woollcombe was about three times longer than this one, but basically none of the content there - [1] - was included when it was "merged" here.
- In the absence of anyone else called Kenneth Woollcombe, surely the article should be under that name. Both of the broadsheet newspaper obituaries call him "The Right Reverend Kenneth Woollcombe" without mentioning his middle name.
- -- One pound (talk) 22:40, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
Was this resolved? -- Secisek (talk) 21:41, 20 March 2008 (UTC)
- I merged the material in myself, but I think we need an admin to effect the page move. -- One pound (talk) 00:22, 22 March 2008 (UTC)