Talk:North American FJ-2/-3 Fury: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 15:11, 22 March 2008

Military history: Aviation / North America / United States Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.Military historyWikipedia:WikiProject Military historyTemplate:WikiProject Military historymilitary history

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on the project's quality scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

Associated task forces:
/
	Military aviation task force
	North American military history task force
	United States military history task force

Aviation: Aircraft Start‑class

This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.AviationWikipedia:WikiProject AviationTemplate:WikiProject Aviationaviation

Start

This article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-class status:
Referencing and citation: criterion not met Coverage and accuracy: criterion not met Structure: criterion met Grammar and style: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met

This article is supported by the aircraft project.

Infobox edits

I'm not sure there's an easy tsolution to being accurate about which airframe was developed from which. THe FJ led to the XP-86 which led to the F-86A, the F-86E led to the FJ-2 and 3, and the FJ-4 has no real F-86 equivilent, being a derivitive of the FJ-3. About the only way to be really clear about it is to split the straight wing FJ-1 off from the swept wings, but there really isn't enough content as yet to do that. Any thoughts/suggestions? - BillCJ 20:27, 14 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The FJ-1 looks completely different to the F-86/FJ-2 and subsequent variants. Not just the straight wings - it's also a fatter, stubbier plane. Drutt 14:57, 2 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

For comparison, FJ-1 and FJ-2 Drutt 14:57, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, technically they are different planes, but as above, they are closely related. In addition, they share the same basic US Navy designation. Given the current lack of extensive coverage on the page, especially usable pics, keeping all the variants together is probably best. Perhaps at some point in the future a split could be made, but right now it would just turn a stubby article into 2 or 3 stubs. - BillCJ 15:25, 3 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Comparable aircraft

The T-2, F-84, MiG-17, Mystère, etc were not comparable at all, these were much more advanced aircraft. For a real comparable list check FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II --Jor70 (talk) 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 14:58, 22 March 2008 edit Bzuk (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 71,057 edits Undid revision 200078999 by 85.21.236.180 revert vandallism ← Previous edit		Revision as of 15:11, 22 March 2008 edit undo 77.253.168.78 (talk) removed Lugii remarks Next edit →
Line 37:		Line 37:

	The T-2, F-84, MiG-17, Mystère, etc were not comparable at all, these were much more advanced aircraft. For a real comparable list check [[FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II]] --[[User:Jor70\|Jor70]] ([[User talk:Jor70\|talk]]) 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)		The T-2, F-84, MiG-17, Mystère, etc were not comparable at all, these were much more advanced aircraft. For a real comparable list check [[FMA IAe 33 Pulqui II]] --[[User:Jor70\|Jor70]] ([[User talk:Jor70\|talk]]) 14:23, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
	:I concur that the list should represent aircraft that had the same general performance which the F-84F, MiG-17 and Mystère although from slightly different eras, qualify as "comparable" having about the same basic subsonic capabilities. I would suggest adding some of the Pulqui list and trimming the present list where applicable. The only aircraft more advanced in terms of equipment may have been the T-2 but even then, the real reason for deleting it is that it represents a training rather than combat aircraft. FWIW [[User:Bzuk\|Bzuk]] ([[User talk:Bzuk\|talk]]) 14:41, 22 March 2008 (UTC)