Talk:Entomology: Difference between revisions
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
== Entomology as evidence of abuse or neglect merging with entomology == |
== Entomology as evidence of abuse or neglect merging with entomology == |
||
I do not think that the two should be merged "Entomology as ...." is a very decent stand alone article and both have enough information to be presented as full articles on their own. I think that people looking for information on insects or entomology in general may not want to peruse through an article that encompasses |
I do not think that the two should be merged "Entomology as ...." is a very decent stand alone article and both have enough information to be presented as full articles on their own. I think that people looking for information on insects or entomology in general may not want to peruse through an article that encompasses the sort of subject matter found in forensic entomology. "Entomology as ...." should definitely be linked, but not merged to the main entomology article. The two topics are different enough to be separate. Thank you for reading the article.--[[User:Angelar.steinhauer|Angelar.steinhauer]] ([[User talk:Angelar.steinhauer|talk]]) 21:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 21:49, 24 March 2008
Arthropods Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Animals Start‑class High‑importance | |||||||||||||||||
|
Hi. This article has some good information, but try http://encyclopedia.com/html/e/entomolo.asp for some more information! Remember to still keep wikipedia running strong though! The site needs you!
-Anonymous-
Why is there a picture of a mammal, specifically a tiger, on the right side of this page? Is this some new classification of insect? 208.230.118.253 18:08, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
Picture
Um, dudes, why is there a picture of a leaf in the info box? Why not put liek a bug or um a butterfly? Thnx —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.123.234.125 (talk) 01:42, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
- It's an insect that looks like a leaf. Look closely. --62.136.150.154 (talk) 21:34, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Entomology as evidence of abuse or neglect merging with entomology
I do not think that the two should be merged "Entomology as ...." is a very decent stand alone article and both have enough information to be presented as full articles on their own. I think that people looking for information on insects or entomology in general may not want to peruse through an article that encompasses the sort of subject matter found in forensic entomology. "Entomology as ...." should definitely be linked, but not merged to the main entomology article. The two topics are different enough to be separate. Thank you for reading the article.--Angelar.steinhauer (talk) 21:45, 24 March 2008 (UTC)