Talk:Chrysomya rufifacies: Difference between revisions
Appearance
Content deleted Content added
Angelina5288 (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{Peer review|archive=1}} |
|||
{{ArthropodTalk}} |
{{ArthropodTalk}} |
||
{{WP Australia |
{{WP Australia |
Revision as of 02:29, 27 March 2008
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
Arthropods Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Australia: Biota B‑class Low‑importance | |||||||||||||||||||
|
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 21 March 2008. Further details are available here. |
A fact from Chrysomya rufifacies appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 24 March 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March. |
I know the copyright guidelines are difficult but it would be cool if you guys used a picture of the larvae so people would really undertsand why they are called the hairy maggot blowfly. --Angelina5288 (talk) 19:32, 25 March 2008 (UTC)
Categories:
- Requests for peer review
- Unassessed Arthropods articles
- Unknown-importance Arthropods articles
- WikiProject Arthropods articles
- B-Class Australia articles
- Low-importance Australia articles
- B-Class Australian biota articles
- Low-importance Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australian biota articles
- WikiProject Australia articles
- Wikipedia articles as assignments
- Wikipedia Did you know articles