Jump to content

User:Ken H: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ken H (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
Learning to help with grounding grammatical modality into base schemas.
Learning to help with grounding grammatical modality into acceptable base schemas.
<br>I have an interest in naturalizing or embodying [[intentionality]] &or; [[intensionality]] and [[gradience]] into language understanding,
<br>I'm new, so clue me at will: &nbsp; [[User_talk:Ken H|talk]] or [mailto:kendallhughes@gmail.com].
<br>in the same sense, or insofaras these may be presentable in AI algorithms.
== &darr; Comment ==
<br>There is a good possibility that [[Jaako Hintikka]]'s notion of a division of labor into:
<u>intentionality-as-directedness</u> and <u>intentionality-as-intensionality</u> is on the right track to helping us out, while maintaining "NPOV".

Critics of [[grammatical mood]], [[grammatical modality]], [[modal auxiliary verb]] and [[grammatical particle]] are especially welcome.

I'm new, so clue me at will: &nbsp; [[User_talk:Ken H|talk]] or [mailto:kendallhughes@gmail.com].

Revision as of 19:35, 2 August 2005

Learning to help with grounding grammatical modality into acceptable base schemas.
I have an interest in naturalizing or embodying intentionalityintensionality and gradience into language understanding,
in the same sense, or insofaras these may be presentable in AI algorithms.
There is a good possibility that Jaako Hintikka's notion of a division of labor into: intentionality-as-directedness and intentionality-as-intensionality is on the right track to helping us out, while maintaining "NPOV".

Critics of grammatical mood, grammatical modality, modal auxiliary verb and grammatical particle are especially welcome.

I'm new, so clue me at will:   talk or [1].