Jump to content

User talk:Confederate till Death: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Irishguy (talk | contribs)
Blocked: denied
Blocked: Review of block
Line 18: Line 18:


{{unblock reviewed|1=Please unblock me. A comment I made, on a talkpage, was misconstrued as being anti-semitic, when the intention was quite on the contrary! It intended as complimentary towards the Jewish people. I was also not even given the slightest chance to explain myself before being blocked. That is extremely un-American. This whole mess could have been avoided had the offended user simply asked me to clarify what I was saying. I deeply apologise to anyone who was offended by my comment, it certainly was not my intention to insult the Jewish race or at all belittle the horrors of their slaughter during the holocaust.|decline=As noted in the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Racist, anti-Semitic_editor|discussion]], your block is based on continual disruptive and bigoted commentary. — <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 00:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)}}
{{unblock reviewed|1=Please unblock me. A comment I made, on a talkpage, was misconstrued as being anti-semitic, when the intention was quite on the contrary! It intended as complimentary towards the Jewish people. I was also not even given the slightest chance to explain myself before being blocked. That is extremely un-American. This whole mess could have been avoided had the offended user simply asked me to clarify what I was saying. I deeply apologise to anyone who was offended by my comment, it certainly was not my intention to insult the Jewish race or at all belittle the horrors of their slaughter during the holocaust.|decline=As noted in the [[Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Racist, anti-Semitic_editor|discussion]], your block is based on continual disruptive and bigoted commentary. — <font color="Green">[[User:Irishguy|'''IrishGuy''']]</font> <sup><font color="Blue">[[User talk:Irishguy|''talk'']]</font></sup> 00:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)}}

{{Unblock|Could I please have a Jewish editor review my case, if he would be so kind. It would be up to him whether or not my comment was offensive or complimentary. Furthermore, an indefinite block seems like complete overkill for such an issue}}

Revision as of 07:01, 28 March 2008

Archive 1

Titanic

I removed your contribution there. I'm not sure if it was intended to be trolling, but it was certainly not calculated to be helpful. --John (talk) 01:27, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Ha ha

Re this. You are still talking about different species. Try to comprehend the very simple concept that within species variation is different to between species variation. You might find it helpful to find out what a species is, as you don't even seem to be aware of the basics of taxonomy. If you insist on commenting on scientific concepts try to at least have an mediocre grasp of the subject. That's why I personally try to only edit articles about things that I know something about. Alun (talk) 16:24, 21 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. Alun (talk) 09:48, 22 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

Information icon There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The discussion is about the topic Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents. Thank you. Tiptoety talk 17:59, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Per discussion, the block length has now been adjusted to indefinite. —Kurykh 18:22, 27 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Confederate till Death (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Please unblock me. A comment I made, on a talkpage, was misconstrued as being anti-semitic, when the intention was quite on the contrary! It intended as complimentary towards the Jewish people. I was also not even given the slightest chance to explain myself before being blocked. That is extremely un-American. This whole mess could have been avoided had the offended user simply asked me to clarify what I was saying. I deeply apologise to anyone who was offended by my comment, it certainly was not my intention to insult the Jewish race or at all belittle the horrors of their slaughter during the holocaust.

Decline reason:

As noted in the discussion, your block is based on continual disruptive and bigoted commentary. — IrishGuy talk 00:42, 28 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user is asking that their block be reviewed:

Confederate till Death (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Could I please have a Jewish editor review my case, if he would be so kind. It would be up to him whether or not my comment was offensive or complimentary. Furthermore, an indefinite block seems like complete overkill for such an issue

Notes:

  • In some cases, you may not in fact be blocked, or your block has already expired. Please check the list of active blocks. If no block is listed, then you have been autoblocked by the automated anti-vandalism systems. Please remove this request and follow these instructions instead for quick attention by an administrator.
  • Please read our guide to appealing blocks to make sure that your unblock request will help your case. You may change your request at any time.
Administrator use only:

If you ask the blocking administrator to comment on this request, replace this template with the following, replacing "blocking administrator" with the name of the blocking admin:

{{Unblock on hold |1=blocking administrator |2=Could I please have a Jewish editor review my case, if he would be so kind. It would be up to him whether or not my comment was offensive or complimentary. Furthermore, an indefinite block seems like complete overkill for such an issue |3 = ~~~~}}

If you decline the unblock request, replace this template with the following code, substituting {{subst:Decline reason here}} with a specific rationale. Leaving the decline reason unchanged will result in display of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

{{unblock reviewed |1=Could I please have a Jewish editor review my case, if he would be so kind. It would be up to him whether or not my comment was offensive or complimentary. Furthermore, an indefinite block seems like complete overkill for such an issue |decline = {{subst:Decline reason here}} ~~~~}}

If you accept the unblock request, replace this template with the following, substituting Accept reason here with your rationale:

{{unblock reviewed |1=Could I please have a Jewish editor review my case, if he would be so kind. It would be up to him whether or not my comment was offensive or complimentary. Furthermore, an indefinite block seems like complete overkill for such an issue |accept = accept reason here ~~~~}}