Jump to content

Energy amplifier: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Line 25: Line 25:
The energy amplifier uses a [[synchrotron]] accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce [[neutron]]s through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile [[Uranium|uranium-233]], an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy.
The energy amplifier uses a [[synchrotron]] accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce [[neutron]]s through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile [[Uranium|uranium-233]], an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy.


This design looks promising but needs more studies until it can be claimed practical and economical.
This design is entirely plausible with currently available technology but requires more study before it can be declared both practical and economical.


[[Category:Nuclear technology]]
[[Category:Nuclear technology]]

Revision as of 16:54, 3 August 2005

In nuclear physics, an energy amplifier is a novel type of nuclear power reactor, a subcritical reactor, in which an energetic particle beam is used to stimulate a reaction, which in turn releases enough energy to power the particle accelerator and leave an energy profit for power generation.

History

The concept is credited to Carlo Rubbia, a nuclear physicist and former director of Europe's CERN international nuclear physics lab. He published a proposal for a power reactor based on a proton cyclotron accelerator with a beam energy of 800 MeV to 1 GeV, and a fuel/moderator target with thorium as fuel and lead as a moderator.

Advantages

The concept has several potential advantages over conventional nuclear fission reactors:

  • Subcritical design means that the reaction could not run away — if anything went wrong, the reaction would stop and the reactor would cool down. A meltdown could however occur if the refrigeration of the core were lost.
  • Thorium is an abundant element — much more so than uranium — reducing strategic and political supply issues and eliminating costly isotope separation. There is enough thorium to generate energy for at least several thousand years at current consumption rates.
  • Less long-lived radioactive waste is produced — most of the waste would decay after 500 years to the level of coal ash. The amplifier could actually be used to transform long-lived waste (like plutonium) from conventional reactors into safer substances.
  • No new science is required; the technologies to build the energy amplifier have all been demonstrated in the laboratory. Building an energy amplifier requires only some engineering effort, not fundamental research (unlike nuclear fusion proposals).
  • Power generation might be economical compared to current nuclear reactor designs if the total fuel cycle and decommissioning costs are considered.
  • Inherent safety and safe fuel transport could make the technology more suitable for developing countries as well as in densely populated areas.

Principle and feasibility

The energy amplifier uses a synchrotron accelerator to produce a beam of protons. These hit a heavy metal target such as lead, thorium or uranium and produce neutrons through the spallation. Thorium nuclei absorb neutrons, thus breeding fissile uranium-233, an isotope of uranium which is not found in nature. Moderated neutrons produce U-233 fission, releasing energy.

This design is entirely plausible with currently available technology but requires more study before it can be declared both practical and economical.