BMG Canada Inc v Doe: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 18:57, 3 August 2005

BMG Canada Inc. and others v. Doe and others is an important Canadian copyright law, file-sharing, and privacy case, where an Ontario Court refused to allow the Canadian Recording Industry Association and several major record labels from obtaining the subscriber information of internet service provider customers alleged to have been infringing copyright. Judgment was delivered 31 March 2004, by federal court in Toronto, Ontario.

The appeal court upheld the core finding of the previous case, that the identities should not be revealed to the plaintiffs, while lowering the test required in this kind of case and also saying that the lower court erred by ruling on whether the alleged filesharing was actually copyright infringement. Judgment was delivered 19 May 2005.

Citation:

BMG Canada Inc. v. John Doe, 2004 FC 488
BMG Canada Inc. v. John Doe, 2005 FCA 193

External links

Revision as of 01:43, 21 July 2005 edit 70.25.1.141 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 18:57, 3 August 2005 edit undo Bobo192 (talk \| contribs) Administrators 116,300 edits Removed repeated word Next edit →
Line 1:		Line 1:
	'''BMG Canada Inc. and others v. Doe and others''' is an important Canadian [[copyright]] law, file-sharing, and privacy case, where an [[Ontario]] Court refused to allow ~~the~~ the [[Canadian Recording Industry Association]] and several major record labels from obtaining the subscriber information of [[internet service provider]] customers alleged to have been infringing copyright. Judgment was delivered [[31 March]] [[2004]], by [[Federal Court of Canada\|federal court]] in [[Toronto]], [[Ontario]].		'''BMG Canada Inc. and others v. Doe and others''' is an important Canadian [[copyright]] law, file-sharing, and privacy case, where an [[Ontario]] Court refused to allow the [[Canadian Recording Industry Association]] and several major record labels from obtaining the subscriber information of [[internet service provider]] customers alleged to have been infringing copyright. Judgment was delivered [[31 March]] [[2004]], by [[Federal Court of Canada\|federal court]] in [[Toronto]], [[Ontario]].

	The appeal court upheld the core finding of the previous case, that the identities should not be revealed to the plaintiffs, while lowering the test required in this kind of case and also saying that the lower court erred by ruling on whether the alleged filesharing was actually copyright infringement. Judgment was delivered [[19 May]] [[2005]].		The appeal court upheld the core finding of the previous case, that the identities should not be revealed to the plaintiffs, while lowering the test required in this kind of case and also saying that the lower court erred by ruling on whether the alleged filesharing was actually copyright infringement. Judgment was delivered [[19 May]] [[2005]].