User talk:ChowHui: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:12, 31 March 2008

Welcome!

Hello, ChowHui, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Eurocopter tigre 10:14, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

These are some instructions which will might help you in editing better and more efficiently on Wikipedia. Regards, Eurocopter tigre 10:34, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks!ChowHui 10:37, 17 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

MiG-29

Don't worry. I can move part of text from one section to another bu I'll not delete anything. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 06:42, 26 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Feel free to edit this or another MiG-29 family articles. Regards, Piotr Mikołajski 14:20, 27 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:RD33MK.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:RD33MK.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:08, 4 July 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		For your tireless & Insomniac contribution to wikipedia, especially to the Mig-35 page. Hoping that you're getting enough sleep and also hoping that you create a user page, so that we know more about you. Good Luck & Great work. Sniperz11 14:47, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:RD-33MK ok.JPG. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:RD-33MK.JPG. The copy called Image:RD-33MK.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone, and you do not need to respond. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and refer to 'my contributions' to remind yourself exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 03:30, 12 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bad fair use of Image:Bottom OLS.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Bottom OLS.jpg, by Russavia (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Bottom OLS.jpg is an image with a clearly invalid fair use tag; or it is an image that fails some part of the non-free content criteria and the uploader has been given 48 hours' notification (for images uploaded after 2006-07-13) or seven days' notification (for images uploaded before that date). (CSD I7).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Image:Bottom OLS.jpg, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. --Android Mouse Bot 2 13:53, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Error bot message ChowHui 05:47, 14 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

My awb edits

I have responded to your comment on my talk page, but I decided it would be best to respond here as well. If you could give me the diff, or at least the page name you are worried about, I can check over my edit to make sure it is correct. However, if I understood you correctly, you were saying that each term in the sentence was supposed to be pluralized. Indeed, if this is correct, then my edit was merely to insert the correctly pluralized "aircraft", as "aircrafts" is not a word in common usage. Charlie-talk to me-what I've done 10:24, 11 November 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sub article for RMAF?

Thanks for the comment on the RMAF article, I had created the sub-article in September to better follow the style used in other air force articles for aircraft fleets. The RMAF was long-winded and did contain some wrong entries. I forgot to remove the original tables then so I thought I had better tidy up. Agree that the rest of the RMAF article could do with a cleanup, although some bits are OK. MilborneOne (talk) 19:22, 5 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Malaysian Army

Just so you'd know, I have stepped in to intervene and I have merged the page Royal Malaysian Army back with Malaysian Army, this is legitimate formatting change (Read WP:MOS). Anyone who attempts to revert this would constitute a violation of the 3 Revert Rule (Read WP:3RR) and I have also warned those few buggers who kept insisting on putting the Royal prefix when it isn't supposed to be there. -- Dave1185 (talk) 01:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

IF you have read the page Malaysian Army, you will see that it is ~~Royal~~ no more. I have set the pages of Royal Malaysian Army, Royal Malaysia Army and Malaysia Army to redirect to the current page. As I have noticed, those few buggers who keep insisting on putting the prefix "Royal" will get a hard time this time when I invoke the 3RR (Read WP:3RR), should they try to be funny. So do you get it now? -- Dave1185 (talk) 02:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Now why would I want to warn you against something you never did? I know that they kept insisting on adding the prefix 'Royal' and you did deleted it a couple of times but they sock puppet it this time by switching the header from Malaysian Army to Royal Malaysian Army when they made the former page redirected to the latter page, hence the reason why I stepped in and reverted the whole thing, check the edit history of both pages and you will see the bigger picture. Cheers. -- Dave1185 (talk) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:00, 31 March 2008 edit Dave1185 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 25,447 edits m reply to chow ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:12, 31 March 2008 edit undo Dave1185 (talk \| contribs) Autopatrolled, Extended confirmed users, File movers, Pending changes reviewers, Rollbackers 25,447 edits m →Malaysian Army: reply to chow Next edit →
Line 54:		Line 54:

	:IF you have read the page [[Malaysian Army]], you will see that it is <s>Royal</s> no more. I have set the pages of ''Royal Malaysian Army'', ''Royal Malaysia Army'' and ''Malaysia Army'' to redirect to the current page. As I have noticed, those few buggers who keep insisting on putting the prefix "Royal" will get a hard time this time when I invoke the 3RR (Read [[Wikipedia:3RR\|WP:3RR]]), should they try to be funny. So do you get it now? -- [[User:Dave1185\|Dave1185]] ([[User talk:Dave1185\|talk]]) 02:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)		:IF you have read the page [[Malaysian Army]], you will see that it is <s>Royal</s> no more. I have set the pages of ''Royal Malaysian Army'', ''Royal Malaysia Army'' and ''Malaysia Army'' to redirect to the current page. As I have noticed, those few buggers who keep insisting on putting the prefix "Royal" will get a hard time this time when I invoke the 3RR (Read [[Wikipedia:3RR\|WP:3RR]]), should they try to be funny. So do you get it now? -- [[User:Dave1185\|Dave1185]] ([[User talk:Dave1185\|talk]]) 02:00, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

			::Now why would I want to warn you against something you never did? I know that they kept insisting on adding the prefix 'Royal' and you did deleted it a couple of times but they sock puppet it this time by switching the header from ''Malaysian Army'' to ''Royal Malaysian Army'' when they made the former page redirected to the latter page, hence the reason why I stepped in and reverted the whole thing, check the edit history of both pages and you will see the bigger picture. Cheers. -- [[User:Dave1185\|Dave1185]] ([[User talk:Dave1185\|talk]]) 02:12, 31 March 2008 (UTC)