Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambgoat: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary |
|||
| Line 5: | Line 5: | ||
*'''Delete'''. Vanity page. What's more interesting is [http://www.lambgoat.com/mb/thread.aspx?id=416726 this thread] on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the [[Atreyu]] article, as you can see from its [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Atreyu&action=history edit history]. And they're still at it. [[User:Nufy8|Nufy8]] 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete'''. Vanity page. What's more interesting is [http://www.lambgoat.com/mb/thread.aspx?id=416726 this thread] on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the [[Atreyu]] article, as you can see from its [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Atreyu&action=history edit history]. And they're still at it. [[User:Nufy8|Nufy8]] 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. |
|||
Revision as of 00:25, 4 August 2005
Seems like a small site, insignificant outside it's small group of users. But feel free to correct me. 57.66.51.165 20:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
This site is actually very important and should be left alone. (Unsigned comment by 216.197.136.14 (talk · contribs))
- Delete. Vanity page. What's more interesting is this thread on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the Atreyu article, as you can see from its edit history. And they're still at it. Nufy8 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)
This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident.