Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Lambgoat: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 02:44, 4 August 2005

Lambgoat

Seems like a small site, insignificant outside it's small group of users. But feel free to correct me. 57.66.51.165 20:46, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This site is actually very important and should be left alone. (Unsigned comment by 216.197.136.14 (talk · contribs))

Delete. Vanity page. What's more interesting is this thread on that website's forums. They banded together to disrupt Wikipedia by vandalizing pages several times, especially the Atreyu article, as you can see from its edit history. And they're still at it. Nufy8 23:02, 3 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. (Unsigned comment by 12.208.76.100 (talk · contribs))

Delete nn website/forumcruft. --Etacar11 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 02:43, 4 August 2005 edit Etacar11 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 13,355 edits →[[Lambgoat]]: unsigned comment, my del vote ← Previous edit		Revision as of 02:44, 4 August 2005 edit undo Etacar11 (talk \| contribs) Extended confirmed users, Rollbackers 13,355 edits m →[[Lambgoat]]: tweak Next edit →
Line 7:		Line 7:

	This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. <small>(Unsigned comment by {{User\|12.208.76.100}})</small>		This article should stay. It relates to internet pop culture. Five million page views per month can't be an accident. <small>(Unsigned comment by {{User\|12.208.76.100}})</small>
	*'''Delete''' nn forumcruft. --[[User:Etacar11\|<font face="Courier"><font color="#66CD00">Etacar11</font></font>]] 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)		*'''Delete''' nn website/forumcruft. --[[User:Etacar11\|<font face="Courier"><font color="#66CD00">Etacar11</font></font>]] 02:43, 4 August 2005 (UTC)