Talk:Foster's Lager: Difference between revisions
→dog flavour: reply |
|||
Line 39: | Line 39: | ||
:Is the flavour you're referring to associated with any particular dog smell, or just "generic dog"? |
:Is the flavour you're referring to associated with any particular dog smell, or just "generic dog"? |
||
:But I digress. In answer to your original question, I believe it's something to do with the grain/yeast combination. I will investigate further, but it's difficult to find Foster's in Australia these days, and American-made Foster's probably tastes different anyway; certainly British-made Foster's has a different taste to Australian-made Foster's. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
:But I digress. In answer to your original question, I believe it's something to do with the grain/yeast combination. I will investigate further, but it's difficult to find Foster's in Australia these days, and American-made Foster's probably tastes different anyway; certainly British-made Foster's has a different taste to Australian-made Foster's. Cheers, [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
:And yes, I imagine a dog flavoured beer would have a certain ''[[wiktionary:je ne sais quoi|je ne sais quoi]]''. [[User:Pdfpdf|Pdfpdf]] ([[User talk:Pdfpdf|talk]]) 01:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 01:13, 2 April 2008
Australia Start‑class | ||||||||||||||||
|
Beer Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
Picture size
Somebody ought to shrink the size of the picture. Even a beer as good as Foster's shouldn't be allowed that much space on a wikipedia article. =P wongabird 02:04, 18 April 2006 (UTC)
Not Suitable for Vegans and Vegetarians
They use fish swim bladders called isinglass to clarify Foster's Lager so it is not suitable for vegans or vegetarians. I have added a reference. 62.3.70.68 11:33, 18 July 2006 (UTC)
Point removed due to fish used in virtually every lager. Dr Wong 07:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)
Removed Unfortunately from this sentence: "Unfortunately this resulted in the alcoholic strength of the local product being reduced from 5% ABV to about 4% ABV." Spaaarkz
Popularity in Australia
Some clown removed this section which I have re-instated as it presents an accurate story about how Fosters became unpopular in its own Birthplace! I take it that the vandal works for CUB. Also altered an inaccurate statement that Heineken is an imported beer in Australia. Not so, it is brewed here under licence by Lion Nathan. Also note that licence, in British and Australian usage, is a noun, as in 'driver's licence'. The form license is a verb... e.g 'licensed to kill'. --MichaelGG 11:32, 6 August 2007 (UTC)
Further strengthened this section by including some refs as to Fosters Groups "preferred beers" in Australia, plus a link to an interview with the current operations manager at the Yatala Brewery (Formerly the Powers Brewery mentioned in this section). Powers was pre-internet so very few references to it still exist, although CUB trots out Powers Gold in 30 can blocks as a Christmas special.--MichaelGG 05:57, 17 August 2007 (UTC)
Fair use rationale for Image:Fosters pint.jpg
Image:Fosters pint.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. [Confusing uninformative waffle and threats deleted.] BetacommandBot (talk) 20:19, 13 February 2008 (UTC)
- A rationale has now been placed on the image page. Pdfpdf (talk) 09:26, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
dog flavour
Question about Foster's: It is more or less similar to American beers, with one important difference: It has a distinctive dog flavor to it. What exactly accounts for this dog flavor and just what is it that makes the dog flavor so different, so appealing? The rabbit in the suitcase (talk) 20:55, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
- (Sceptical, but "Assuming Good Faith" ...)
- What is a "dog flavour"? Pdfpdf (talk) 23:34, 29 March 2008 (UTC)
I apologize, I should have been clearer. Of course, I've never tasted dog, per se, but of course everyone is familiar with the smell of dog. As an experiment, you might try a comparison: First, take a taste of your standard issue American beer, say Budweiser or Miller, then a taste of Foster's. Try to pinpoint the difference.
To me, the difference is dog flavor. Now what is dog flavor? It's a certain je sais quoi I might describe as the flavor of an American lager steeped with dog. That is to say, imagine taking a vat of Budweiser, allowing a small pack of dogs to swim in it, filtering, then bottling. I believe the result would bear a striking similarity to Foster's.
Now obviously, Foster's probably does not use this approach to achieve their distinctive flavor. But what do they do instead? That's what I'd like to know. The rabbit in the suitcase (talk) 22:01, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- Mmmmmm. I see. Thank you for clarifying that you did, indeed, mean exactly what you said.
- I presume you're aware that a dog may have several smells? (e.g. wet dog, dusty dog, freshly washed dog, etc.)
- Is the flavour you're referring to associated with any particular dog smell, or just "generic dog"?
- But I digress. In answer to your original question, I believe it's something to do with the grain/yeast combination. I will investigate further, but it's difficult to find Foster's in Australia these days, and American-made Foster's probably tastes different anyway; certainly British-made Foster's has a different taste to Australian-made Foster's. Cheers, Pdfpdf (talk) 01:00, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
- And yes, I imagine a dog flavoured beer would have a certain je ne sais quoi. Pdfpdf (talk) 01:13, 2 April 2008 (UTC)