User talk:AnnaJGrant: Difference between revisions
Chriscarlos (talk | contribs) |
Chriscarlos (talk | contribs) No edit summary |
||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Why can't Wikipedia either delete Afro Guatemalan and just expand Afro Latin American? The first one seems to be almost a complete copy of the reference that is linked. Is that ethically correct? Is there someone that can be asked?--[[User:Chriscarlos|Chriscarlos]] ([[User talk:Chriscarlos|talk]]) 05:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
Why can't Wikipedia either delete Afro Guatemalan and just expand Afro Latin American? The first one seems to be almost a complete copy of the reference that is linked. Is that ethically correct? Is there someone that can be asked?--[[User:Chriscarlos|Chriscarlos]] ([[User talk:Chriscarlos|talk]]) 05:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
The point of my question is to ask if there can either be an improvement that is ethically correct and intellectually honest, and if not, discuss what may be options, including deleting this article.--[[User:Chriscarlos|Chriscarlos]] ([[User talk:Chriscarlos|talk]]) 10:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 10:01, 3 April 2008
April 2008
Spring Cleaning Time! (Removal of all notes, leaving room for fresh and new things that spring brings.)
Archiving
Rather than deleting everything on the talkpage, some editors archive it. See Help:Archiving a talk page. Edison (talk) 14:33, 2 April 2008 (UTC)
Is Fred Thompson of Latin American descent? Can you verify that? I will edit the article to reflect its previous version while you fact check Thompson's ethnic background. If he is not of Latin American descent, please do not change articles to imply he is. Thank you.--Chriscarlos (talk) 05:08, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
Why can't Wikipedia either delete Afro Guatemalan and just expand Afro Latin American? The first one seems to be almost a complete copy of the reference that is linked. Is that ethically correct? Is there someone that can be asked?--Chriscarlos (talk) 05:39, 3 April 2008 (UTC)
The point of my question is to ask if there can either be an improvement that is ethically correct and intellectually honest, and if not, discuss what may be options, including deleting this article.--Chriscarlos (talk) 10:01, 3 April 2008 (UTC)