Talk:Swordfish (film)

Would it be relevant to discuss how the opening dialog by Travolta's character being about how terrible Hollywood is with respect to realism and the many, many problems in this film? The movie uses movie physics for its guns, and movie computer technology (techno-babble and random, made up computer technology). DoomBringer 06:20, 31 May 2006 (UTC)

According to Linus Torvalds books there are only about 30 Torvalds in the world, so the name Axl Torvalds has to be at least half a play on Linus' name. --Busterdog 01:04, 9 October 2006 (UTC)

I think it's funny that Axl Torvalds speaks German, although he's supposed to be Finnish (although he allegedly has connections to Germany close enough to own a German passport) [1] 惑乱 分からん 21:21, 27 October 2006 (UTC)

A Finn named Axl Torvalds (Rudolf Martin) appears early in the film. His name was at first thought to be a pun on the Linux godfather Linus Torvalds - I really don't think that it qualifies as a 'pun'...tribute at best, maybe. Adonai-aus- 06:31, 24 May 2007 (UTC)

It has now been revealed that the name is actually a reference to Guns and Roses frontman Axl Rose. Who revealed this? This sounds like BS. What would this guy have to do with Axl Rose? Teclis1 23:25, 17 July 2007 (UTC)

Cyberpunk?

Well, Cyber, maybe. But the film feels about as "punk" as 2 Fast 2 Furious. Just a word of warning if you haven't seen it and expect a decent hacker film. — Ashmodai ^{(talk · contribs)} 13:21, 14 January 2007 (UTC)

Agreed. That should be removed. I'd do it myself, but I CBF. --Anonymous 16:58, 29 March 2007 (UTC)

Definitely not cyberpunk. Checking against criteria defined ni the cyberpunk article, it fails even on the loosest definitions - it's not set in the future and none of the story takes place in the online world. Unless there is anyone willing to defend the cyberpunk position, lose it.

OK I'm taking it out

Jackman Wheeze

I think some information about the Jackman Wheeze is required —The preceding unsigned comment was added by Mhrmaw (talk • contribs) 11:29, 25 January 2007 (UTC).

I can't find a single reference to the "trademark" Jackman Wheeze anywhere else. I'm removing that blurb unless you can back up your claim that it's his "trademark". It may be funny to some people, but that doesn't mean that it's worth including. Secretagentwang 14:40, 22 February 2007 (UTC)

Thomas Jefferosn once shot a man on the white house lawn for treason?

did he really? if not what is the signifigance of this line? —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 74.129.223.109 (talk) 00:36, 11 April 2007 (UTC).

Fair use rationale for Image:Swordfish movie.jpg

Image:Swordfish movie.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Trivia

Kudos to whoever removed the unsourced and uninteresting trivia section. I do feel however it's worthwhile to include a link to Swordfish (password) somewhere on the article. I'm putting it in a "See also" section for now. Feel free to work it into the main article. -Verdatum (talk) 17:15, 18 January 2008 (UTC)

It shocks me at all the people that consider triva "worthless". Trivia adds a lot to an article; it gives us a section where we can put interesting facts. THe problem ONLY arrises when trivia becomes 5 pages of people saying stuff like "1 hour and 36 minutes into the film, the price of a coffee in the coffee shop is $2.37. If you take the name swordfish, and give each letter a number value (A=1 B=2 etc.), and those up, multiply by 15, take the sqare root, divide by 300, and multiply that by the cubed root of 1700 you get EXACTLY 2.37!!!!!". As long as its actuall trivia though, and only a few interesting things, a trivia section adds a lot.DurotarLord (talk) 14:23, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

I tend to agree with the stance taken at WP:HTRIV. -Verdatum (talk) 14:28, 7 April 2008 (UTC)