User talk:NawlinWiki/Archive 21: Difference between revisions

Browse history interactively

← Previous edit Next edit →

Content deleted Content added

VisualWikitext

Inline

Revision as of 23:53, 7 April 2008

This talk page is archived every month (if I remember). The older pages are indexed at User talk:NawlinWiki/Archives.

Wondering why your article was speedily deleted? Check this list first.

Please add all comments at the bottom of the page (or I may not be able to find them).

_________

Masks

I'm not really sure what's going on with the Masks pages? Grsz 11 15:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Adam Heether

Just a quick question about the above. You declined my nomination for speedy deletion based on draft into AAA ball. For speedy purposes does that assertion trump the notability guidelines in WP:BASEBALL, which he clearly does not meet? Not making an issue of this, just curious for future reference. Thanks. – ukexpat (talk) 19:18, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK thanks for the clarification. – ukexpat (talk) 19:26, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Starwinder

The starwinder is not about a real person or band or organiztion. Its about a Playstation sci-fi racing game. Its not a web game, Gamepot and MobyGames are offical gamesites.

Starwinder at Gamespot

Starwinder at MobyGames

Does this count?

Starwinder

Not sure I understande, when you main realible does it main the official site?

"Stops Signs Don't Exist (album)"

What does this CONFIRMED and NOTABLE album release ahve to do with‎ Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Profound Intent (2nd nomination)). What about that was reposted???? But yet you make a article about some dumb PlayStation game. Donotello smite myers (talk) 22:36, 1 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User:ShadowKinght Talk

Just curious...

...but did you see this? CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 03:06, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK. Just wanted to be sure. It turns out that not everybody puts their archives on their watchlist. Cheers. CambridgeBayWeather Have a gorilla 03:54, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Deletion of Jami Smith wiki

Hello. The wiki article I recently created for Jami Smith was "speedy deleted" as "blatant advertising."

I actually can understand why it would seem this way, but it is not intended to be. Jami Smith is a legitimate Christian artist and there are several of her peers with wiki articles. I feel strongly that she deserves a presence on wikipedia as much as any of those peers and I am happy to edit the article to remove anything that you feel comes across as "blatant advertising."

Please let me know what can be done to remedy this situation. Thank you. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jtk95 (talk • contribs) 16:43, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Anti-Gazumping Agreement

I was in the middle of editing this article when it was tagged for speedy deletion by User:RnB. There was no notice, nothing. The article was deleted even while I was adding references. He obviously mistook the legal markup of the agreement as patent nonsense. Can you please restore it?Anwar (talk) 18:41, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gruntlord6 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · nuke contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Hi. Gruntlord6g wrote, "this is a shared computer". I've also tagged Gruntlord6f as possible sockpuppet, although the name only appears in Listusers and not user creation log. Um, what does "this is a shared computer" mean (oh and when the this page rip space time continuum when they put WP:NQS or did they mean WP:NAS)? Thanks. ~A H 1^(TCU) 00:38, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

School or anonymous blocks

Recently I posted in my organization's public IP user talk that the public IP belongs to a school, and should be school-blocked or anonymous-blocked. I noticed you have reverted a few article blankings and vandalism that have occured from this shared IP, as well as a temporary block, so I thought I would ask you to do this again permanantly.
However, if a block is put on for anonymous edits, is it an option to continue to allow account creation from the IP? --Addrockk (talk) 14:18, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Article Pico Ralla

Hi Nawlin, is it possible to Salt the above article for now? I tagged this one 4 times in the past 4 days, with 3 tags today already. I assume that the article is going to end up just being re-created every time. Thanks in advance :) Excirial^{(Talk,Contribs)} 16:24, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk and user pages. Much appreciated, JNW (talk) 00:02, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You beat me to the punch

Thank you so much for this. I was in the process of doing the same thing. - eo (talk) 00:22, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your help

I actually made it my wholelife so far not knowing how to spell ~~Michegan~~ Michigan... hmmmmmm. It still looks more right to me the wrong way. LOL. Thanks, Jerry talk ¤ count/logs 04:19, 5 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

PLEASE HELP

I am concerned that the page "The Sonic Society" was erased without very much help. The Sonic Society has been the number one show through broadcasting in Canada as well as podcasting all around the world to showcase new audio drama around the world. Both Jack Ward and Shannon Hilchie are innovators in audio drama for the 21st century and their company Sonic Cinema Productions have produced original works that have been heard all around the world. There are already examples of modern audio drama additions in Wikipedia: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_Jack_Justice http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Audio_drama

But precious few. But there are other entries of podiobook authors http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/J.C._Hutchins http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tee_Morris http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mur_Lafferty

And even podcasts http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Escape_Pod

Please help me understand what needs to be done to make this page accepted. Thanks,

Jimmy robbins

Thank you for deleting the article I speedied on. Its nice to you have sysops around. Nothing 444^{Go Irish!} 00:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

JEKAZOL (deleted - now added extra text with expaination)

Hi there,

You have deleted my Jekazol page which I refound via an advanced search. I have ammended the page with extra info and an explaination of why I think it should be included. I hope you will re-examine and accept this page now. It is intended to allow any curious fans of the music to discover word meanings used in the songs. Thanks for your time either way.

William Morton —Preceding unsigned comment added by 82.45.86.120 (talk) 01:51, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vcmediasolutions (talk) 17:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC) Hi, i had my article speedily deleted, due to lack of content. I was actually still writing it, and was trying to work out how to add a new section. Also, advice on that would be nice too.[reply]

Deletion Review for RCS Guambo

An editor has asked for a deletion review of RCS Guambo. Since you closed the deletion discussion for this article, speedy-deleted it, or were otherwise interested in the article, you might want to participate in the deletion review. 162.83.183.35 (talk) 20:55, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

"Nice Try"

I was not intending to create this article as a piece of nonsense. I was attempting to make it as a notable article, and explained it as such in its own right. Furthermore, this was deleted while the hangon tag was on the page. Isn't it procedural to allow me a chance to explain myself before deletion? Diikiw (talk) 23:32, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I wrote: "Wikiid was created partly as a lighthearted challenge to Wikipedia’s notability requirements." I wasn't attempting to evade them at all. I honestly thought that such a referential article would be one that could be arguably notable, and certainly not one nonsensical enough to merit speedy deletion.

And don't worry. I do edit Wikipedia quite a bit. I just do it under my school ip, rather than with a user name: I keep trying to prove that my school isn't entirely vandal-laden. Diikiw (talk) 23:36, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I know this is probably annoyingly persistent, but I did at least ATTEMPT to claim validity. Doesn't that mean it needs to be put up to vote? And this wasn't an article about something else that was attempting to become prominent on Wikipedia, it was an article about itself being prominent due to that fact, and being a valuable piece of art besides. If I cited an article from a notable source discussing the value of user-generated content, or a set of articles backing my fact, would the article become possibly valid? I'm asking in all seriousness.

Failing that, could I possibly get the source to the article I wrote back? I'd like to preserve it at least somewhere, in case something else comes up that makes it valid. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Diikiw (talk • contribs) 23:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Oh, well. I tried.

And yes. I promise I'll only post it as a subset of my user page. What can I say, maybe I'll be able to write a nifty article about how to make it.