Talk:Cochliomyia: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
|||
Line 15: | Line 15: | ||
Good luck!--[[User:Amandamartinez06|Amandamartinez06]] ([[User talk:Amandamartinez06|talk]]) 06:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
Good luck!--[[User:Amandamartinez06|Amandamartinez06]] ([[User talk:Amandamartinez06|talk]]) 06:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
Great page--very thorough and well done. We are linking our page (blow-fly) to yours under our economic importance section. Is there any way you could take a picture in the class lab of an adult? I think it would be a good touch to your page. I really like the larva picture on your taxobox. [[User:Alli5414|Alli5414]] ([[User talk:Alli5414|talk]]) 16:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC) |
Revision as of 16:23, 8 April 2008
This article was the subject of an educational assignment that ended on 21 March 2008. Further details are available here. |
A request has been made for this article to be peer reviewed to receive a broader perspective on how it may be improved. Please make any edits you see fit to improve the quality of this article. |
Arthropods Unassessed | ||||||||||
|
A fact from Cochliomyia appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know column on 25 March 2008 (check views). A record of the entry may be seen at Wikipedia:Recent additions/2008/March. |
This article has a lot of good information and is organized very well. The only problem that I can point out is that you could have put more internal Wikipedia links in the characteristic section. For example, you could link to the setae and the pedipalp pages, as well as a few others. But overall its a great article.--Angelina5288 (talk) 02:36, 26 March 2008 (UTC)
Wikispecies
Hey guys! I just wanted to let you all know about the Wikispecies project [[1]]. Your article fits in with their project, so look into it. ABrundage, Texas A&M University (talk) 20:38, 31 March 2008 (UTC)
Comments
Hey guys, just looking at your article and the content is great! I noticed that in the references section there are URL's listed. Please note that wikipedia prefers having links to the websites at the beginning of the reference, rather than a URL. I have copied an example from our own article Forensic Entomological Decomposition for you to follow because it can be really to understand. So, here you go:
<ref name=Vass>[http://209.85.173.104/search?q=cache:fZ0vNjwsJ50J:www.sgm.ac.uk/pubs/micro_today/pdf/110108.pdf+vass+decomposition&hl=en&ct=clnk&cd=1&gl=us Publications: Microbiology Today] Vass, Arpad A. "Beyond the Grave- Understanding Human Decomposition." Publications: Microbilogy Today. Nov. 2001. The Society for General Microbiology. 12 Feb. 2008 </ref>
Good luck!--Amandamartinez06 (talk) 06:59, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Great page--very thorough and well done. We are linking our page (blow-fly) to yours under our economic importance section. Is there any way you could take a picture in the class lab of an adult? I think it would be a good touch to your page. I really like the larva picture on your taxobox. Alli5414 (talk) 16:23, 8 April 2008 (UTC)