Jump to content

User:Ken H: Difference between revisions

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Ken H (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Ken H (talk | contribs)
mNo edit summary
Line 4: Line 4:
<br>There is a possibility that [[Jaakko Hintikka]]'s notion of a division of labor into:
<br>There is a possibility that [[Jaakko Hintikka]]'s notion of a division of labor into:
<u>intentionality-as-directedness</u> and
<u>intentionality-as-directedness</u> and
<br/> &nbsp; <u>intentionality-as-intensionality</u> is on the right track to communicate about an npov realis.
<br/> &nbsp; <u>intentionality-as-intensionality</u> is on the right track to communicate about an npov realis intentionality.


Fans of [[grammatical mood]], [[grammatical modality]], [[modal auxiliary verb]] and [[grammatical particle]] are most welcome.
Fans of [[grammatical mood]], [[grammatical modality]], [[modal auxiliary verb]] and [[grammatical particle]] are most welcome.

Revision as of 09:30, 7 August 2005

Learning to help this encyclopedia with harmonizing topics in grammatical modality, mood and mode.
I'm interested in naturalizing or embodying intentionality OR intensionality AND gradience into language understandings.
This would be in the same sense as, or insofaras, these neoplatonisms nominals may be 'found' in an algorithm.
There is a possibility that Jaakko Hintikka's notion of a division of labor into: intentionality-as-directedness and
  intentionality-as-intensionality is on the right track to communicate about an npov realis intentionality.

Fans of grammatical mood, grammatical modality, modal auxiliary verb and grammatical particle are most welcome.

I'm new, so clue me at will: · ken(T) or [1].