User talk:Amire80

Hello and Shalom,

To add a new topic click the + at the top of the page. I shall reply here.

To reply in an existing topic click the [edit] link on the right.

If i wrote you on your user page, please reply there, so as not to break the conversation to inconvenient pieces. I'll see your reply.

If you don't have a Wikipedia account, i'll be thankful if you would create an account before posting.

It is not obligatory, but it is easy and quick, and no personal details are required.

If you have an account, i'll be thankful if you would sign your name at the end of the message by writing --~~~~.

CONLANGS

So, you like conlangs. Have you ever tried to create one? MR.CRO95 (talk) 09:19, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

Not really. I sometimes imagine something like Lojban, but without any words - only with numbers. It would be a language for computers, not for people.

The trouble is that i am too busy doing other interesting things instead of working on this. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 14:21, 28 March 2008 (UTC)

OK. I am creating a language, and it's almost complete. It's called Juranian. -- MR.CRO95 (talk) 14:26, 12 April 2008 (UTC)

Adoption - Arphibagon

Will you adopt me. My page has an adoption link so you can adopt me there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Arphibagon (talk • contribs) 19:46, 30 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

I shall gladly help you with anything.

I checked your edits. If you have anything to write about "quintorial", then it must be based on reliable sources. Please read Wikipedia:No original research - the core Wikipedia policy on this matter. To put it short - if you're the only person who wrote about quintorials, then it shouldn't be on Wikipedia. If information about them was already published in reliable sources, then fell free to write about it, but provide a reference to the sources. If you wrote a paper about it yourself, then you can use it as a source, if it was published in a reliable publication, such as a scientific journal. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Adoption - Ezrah 001

I have a recovered my son from Autism. So that alone is a controversial statement. I would like to get information about Autism to be more up to date on Wikipedia and especially some treatments that are listed as options updated. The articles are very out of date especially as a client having experiences them. So I have a lot of POV and personal experience but have meet with very little success converting this information to fact and into articles.

So I need coaching on how to get fact and remove some of the fiction from Wiki around Autism and Autism treatment.

Warm regards, Ezrah 001 (talk) 22:13, 31 March 2008 (UTC)

Hi,

I'll gladly assist you with anything. Feel free to ask me for absolutely any help.

Regarding your particular question about autism: Personal experience may help you with your editing, but it is not enough. You need to prove that the facts you insert are correct and verifiable by other Wikipedia editors, by providing reliable sources. Please read Wikipedia:Verifiability - the core Wikipedia content policy on this matter. If you don't understand anything there, ask me. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 07:46, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Admir,

Thank you much, I will review the section you mentioned. Once I have done that I would like to put up some information I have on studies and what is in some current articles for some guidence from you. Thanks again, I very much appreciate your help. Ezrah 001 (talk) 22:21, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Amir, I have found myself in the middle of a debate my first time out as a contributor. I am wondering if you could review a discussion threat and help me find a middle ground. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Son-Rise Ezrah 001 (talk) 23:53, 3 April 2008 (UTC)

Adoption - Fromuswithlove

Hi Amire80,

I am an absolute newby to this and would like to know if you would perhaps be able to help me. Are we allowed to have information on charity work done almost like a newsletter from a personal account. I live in South Africa and currently there are amazing projects that are happening here and would like to have this information and get discussions going about this topic, as well as peoples thoughts etc

Thank you

--Fromuswithlove (talk) 09:12, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

Hello.

All information in Wikipedia must be referenced to published reliable sources. Private emails are not published, which is enough to make them unusable as reliable sources. If this charity work has been covered at least in newspapers, then it can be covered in Wikipedia in an encyclopedic form.

Please read Wikipedia:Reliable sources to get an idea of what is considered a reliable source. If you don't understand anything or have any more questions, feel free to ask me. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 09:23, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

A-classs vs Good Article

Hey Amir. I was just wondering something. Which article is better: one that has received an A-class on quality or a Good Article? Thanks, Idontknow610^TM 21:29, 1 April 2008 (UTC)

According to Wikipedia:Version 1.0 Editorial Team/Assessment, A is better than Good. --Amir E. Aharoni (talk) 10:27, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Thx. Idontknow610^TM 18:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)

Hi Amir, my name is KALMANI & I need your help to do the right thing.

I'm Kalmani, I'm having problems with people changing my comments on discussion pages of an article & even putting my real name on the discussion page. Since I'm put in a predicament where if I try to correct anything they bully me in saying in I would be banned & revert back to their saying like a wikipedia mafia...So they know I'm new in editing but I would like to learn & some help to fight back to do whats right. I don't know what to do. Please adopt me. The article i was helping out with is biased & controlled but if you can please help me out. I would be very grateful & in debt to you. Thank You for your time sir. KALMANI (talk) 09:10, 4 April 2008 (UTC)

Wiki Amazing Race

Amire80: you have been invited to participate in Wiki Amazing Race, a project by Shapiros10. If you want to participate, sign your name under the "teams" section. I will divide up groups. If you aren't familiar, read up on The Amazing Race. The "tasks" will be trivia. Thank you! ♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ 23:50, 5 April 2008 (UTC)

Admin Coaching

Amir-would you possibly be my admin coach? That would be awesome. I have 759 edits now, and will probably go for it towards the end of May. ♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ 20:26, 8 April 2008 (UTC)

The Kalmani issue

I think that Asm ccc is Kalmani's sock. They both have "defend the truth" on their userpages, and Asm ccc joined in on an edit war between Kalmani and Chaldean. How do you request checkuser? ♥Shapiros10WuzHere♥ 20:28, 8 April 2008 (UTC)