Talk:Ray Carney: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 03:35, 14 April 2008

	Biography portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography
B	This article has been rated as B-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

This article was originally very biased towards its subject. It has been improved, but it still seems to be attacking Cassavete's wife, Gena Rowlands. The claims that Rowlands got Faces out of the Library of Congress and got Carney fired from the box-set thing should be verified. JoaoRicardo 05:12, 23 Jan 2005 (UTC)

I see no reason to doubt what Carney says in the referenced interviews. It is clearly not in his interest to make factual claims that could be easily proven false. The notice about factual accuracy seems to me therefore to be out of place. (One may, of course, object to Carney's behaviour in this episode without disputing the facts of the matter.) Sir Paul 03:33, Mar 10, 2005 (UTC)

I agree with Sir Paul-- I think the article's NPOV stance has been greatly improved. Also, now that all the claims Carney has made have been referenced, I think the factual dispute notice should be removed. Anonymoustom 12:00 Apr 27, 2005

The new section on Rowlands presents both her legal argument and Carney's, as well as some personal background on the two of them. I think this has quite effectively nulled the NPOV stance and I am taking the liberty of removing the notice. --Anonymoustom 15:04, 20 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

>>Those who can, do. Those who can't (due to a staggering lack of talent and fair share of envy), critique!

NPOV Dispute?

This article was very recently tagged with an NPOV/Weasel words notice. I think the edits made two years ago bring this very much in line with a neutral point of view, and I haven't detected any "weasel" words. Would anyone like to bring up any specific points that they feel need addressing? 68.41.109.188 21:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Since there's no dispute that I can ascertain, I'm going to be bold and remove the notices.Anonymoustom (talk) 03:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revision as of 21:57, 15 September 2007 edit 68.41.109.188 (talk) No edit summary ← Previous edit		Revision as of 03:35, 14 April 2008 edit undo Anonymoustom (talk \| contribs) 335 edits →NPOV Dispute? Next edit →
Line 19:		Line 19:

	This article was very recently tagged with an NPOV/Weasel words notice. I think the edits made two years ago bring this very much in line with a neutral point of view, and I haven't detected any "weasel" words. Would anyone like to bring up any specific points that they feel need addressing? [[User:68.41.109.188\|68.41.109.188]] 21:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)		This article was very recently tagged with an NPOV/Weasel words notice. I think the edits made two years ago bring this very much in line with a neutral point of view, and I haven't detected any "weasel" words. Would anyone like to bring up any specific points that they feel need addressing? [[User:68.41.109.188\|68.41.109.188]] 21:57, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

			Since there's no dispute that I can ascertain, I'm going to be bold and remove the notices.[[User:Anonymoustom\|Anonymoustom]] ([[User talk:Anonymoustom\|talk]]) 03:35, 14 April 2008 (UTC)