Jump to content

User talk:PhatRita: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
PhatRita (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
PhatRita (talk | contribs)
No edit summary
Line 1: Line 1:
AWAY for another while. [[User:PhatRita|PhatRita]] 16:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)

Hi please leave a message after the beep, and I'll try and get back to you asap! [[User:PhatRita|PhatRita]]
Hi please leave a message after the beep, and I'll try and get back to you asap! [[User:PhatRita|PhatRita]]



Revision as of 16:46, 9 August 2005

AWAY for another while. PhatRita 16:46, 9 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hi please leave a message after the beep, and I'll try and get back to you asap! PhatRita

BEEEEEEP


Greetings

Greetings PR. I though I'd let you know that most of the alternative medicine articles have actually quieted down quite a bit in the last few months. Some of the more, erm, "opinionated" editors have left us for less contentious pastures, one assumes. So, I'd like to encourage you to wade right in and have fun. If you have any questions, feel free to drop me a line. Fire Star 1 July 2005 21:11 (UTC)

Abdomen pics

Hey there! I took the Grays pic from here http://www.bartleby.com/107/illus392.html and assumed that the date of the publication... "Henry Gray (1825–1861). Anatomy of the Human Body. 1918." meant it was public domain. But I'm no expert.... There's bound to be someone on here who could help, User_talk:Quadell seems to know a fair bit about these things. But quoting from his website I think the key is this: "If any photograph was first published before 1923, then the U.S. considers it PD no matter what the country of origin thinks". These images are held on American servers so it's PD for wiki, I'm not sure of the legalities passed that. See his page for more details: http://freeimages.blogspot.com/ Hope that helps? SeanMack 18:13, 18 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

preclinical medicine?

I would warmly encourage a preclinical Wikiproject! I'm completely out of touch with basic anatomy and embryology, and most Wikipedia pages on these topics are somewhat outdated, stubbly or otherwise unsightly. There are a few other medical students around here, like Nephron, Turbantia, Nmg20 and a couple of others. I'll help out when necessary! JFW | T@lk 10:57, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I'd start with: the village pump, the Clinical Medicine talk page and the talk pages of all medically inclined people you've come accross. It shouldn't be too hard :-) JFW | T@lk 11:17, 22 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]
I'd prefer just to do articles here and there as I see the need. Today, I felt inspired to do the femoral vein... which is very student-ish. Tomorrow, I don't know what I'll want to do... Nephron 01:15, 23 July 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your interest! I have begun setting it up at Wikipedia:WikiProject Clinical medicine/MCOTF. I'd appreciate any advice or suggestions you may have. See you at the talk page! — Knowledge Seeker 23:35, July 25, 2005 (UTC)

Re: Arm

PhatRita, you seem to have removed a large amount of writeup on this article. Why did you did so? Why not just add to the previous content? Alex.tan 02:00, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Please see Talk:Arm and place further replies there. Alex.tan 18:38, July 30, 2005 (UTC)

Human anatomy catgory

Hi, thanks for your nice notes. I don't mind at all if the human anatomy cat is deleted. I only made it because it was the only (or first) grouping obvious to me from the article titles. I see that you or someone else has already put about about 50 articles into subcats. That's great. Maurreen (talk) 02:37, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Categorising Forehead

Despite your academic credentials in the field of anatomy, I have taken the bold move of attempting to correct your medical knowledge by moving Forehead from the category 'Pelvis' to 'Head and Neck'. Please feel free to correct me if I am wrong. akaDruid 15:09, 2 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

That's OK, you made me laugh, I assumed you'd put it in as a deliberate error. I did a double take at first... akaDruid 14:16, 4 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Thanks for your work on the first Wikipedia:Medicine Collaboration of the Week! I'm quite proud of how much the article improved, and I hope we remain an active force, improving medical articles on Wikipedia. — Knowledge Seeker 02:41, August 5, 2005 (UTC)