Jump to content

User talk:Stwalkerster: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
New pages: new section
Line 287: Line 287:


Thank you for blocking [[User talk:216.56.60.210|this user]] for two months as he kept redoing the vandalism I reverted. Thank you and well done in your new position as administrator. --[[User:FGWQPR|FGWQPR]] ([[User talk:FGWQPR|talk]]) 19:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for blocking [[User talk:216.56.60.210|this user]] for two months as he kept redoing the vandalism I reverted. Thank you and well done in your new position as administrator. --[[User:FGWQPR|FGWQPR]] ([[User talk:FGWQPR|talk]]) 19:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)

== New pages ==

Sorry, it's me again... I was just wondering, I'm looking at the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REQUEST, as I'm trying to request for a new page to be added... =S it doesn't fit into any of the categories though, but I've found another page on wikipedia which is on a similar subject... any help? (let me guess... another one of those side links!) <(^__^)>

Revision as of 19:33, 17 April 2008

User:Stwalkerster/Status

User:Stwalkerster/AutoArchive




Thanks for your help with formatting hyperlinks!

You are now an administrator

Your Administrator's Shirt! :D The Helpful One (Review) 18:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats, and remember to maintain nothing more than a semblance of seriousness. :-) —Animum (talk) 16:10, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations, I have just closed your RfA as successful and made you an administrator. Take a look at the administrators' how-to guide and the administrators' reading list if you haven't read those already. Also, the practice exercises at the new admin school may be useful. If you have any questions, get in touch on my talk page. WjBscribe 15:55, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Well done! Rudget. 16:28, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks! :DD Stwalkerstertalk ] 16:30, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Congrats! I though others would be me too it but obviously they didnt :D! The Helpful One (Review) 18:37, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Just wanted to offer my congratulations too :-). Cheers, tim.bounceback 20:36, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why thank you. you are such a good friend. you should meet me on the Amtrax —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.168.84.106 (talk) 22:15, 31 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It seems I'm late to the party. But congratulations. seresin ( ¡? ) 22:29, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please Urgent Regarding Susan Wayland

Dear Sir I wrote an article about the famous (at least in fetish society )model susan wayland,I wrote the article and intended to increase it after having prper permission from miss wayland,you delted it cause you think it is about un notable person,but please go to google and search for susan wayland and then judge by yourself. If you insist on deleting the article,please provide me with a copy of it to publish it some where else. Thanx —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loover (talkcontribs) 18:32, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that article because it was an article about a real person that did not indicate why its subject is important or significant. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:05, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

So would you return my article after i explained the importance of that person??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loover (talkcontribs) 19:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) I hope that u will undelete the article cause i gave miss wayland the address of it so that she can correct it and gimme pemission to publish some pictures and personal info thanx[reply]

So would you return my article after i explained the importance of that person??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loover (talk • contribs) 19:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) I hope that u will undelete the article cause i gave miss wayland the address of it so that she can correct it and gimme pemission to publish some pictures and personal info thanx

urgent 2

So would you return my article after i explained the importance of that person??? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loover (talk • contribs) 19:25, 2 April 2008 (UTC) I hope that u will undelete the article cause i gave miss wayland the address of it so that she can correct it and gimme pemission to publish some pictures and personal info thanx

Will you please stop spamming my talk page? Thanks. I will put the contents of the deleted page into your user area, as it is unsuitable for the main article space. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:42, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
OK, as you requested, it's here: User:Loover/Susan Wayland. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:50, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Urgent 3

Thank u very much,I know that i am a pain in the ass,but please can u return it as an article rather than as a personal space article?? thanx for your patienceLoover (talk) 19:55, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, that article fails the speedy deletion criteria, if I was to restore it to article space, it would only be deleted by another admin, and they might not be willing to undelete it. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:57, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

urgent 4

Then plz can u tell me what to do to make it ilegiable for publishing as independent article??i told u it is about a famous person ,what else i have to do?? ThanxLoover (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 20:03, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You need to make the article follow WP:N, WP:BLP, , and preferably WP:BETTER, and WP:MOS, among other things. I think those are the most important issues in this case. It might also help to have a read of WP:NOT, and WP:V, and also WP:AUTO. Stwalkerstertalk ] 20:15, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

urgent 5

Dear admin Thanx for your patience i followed your guidlines in writing the article and improved it way much ,now it is much better yyet not perfect I hope that u can take a look at it now and tell me wheather it is ilegiable for publishing i continued to improve it or still not.if not plz gimme some help to make it so. thnx again Dr.Ahmed —Preceding unsigned comment added by Loover (talkcontribs) 16:08, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for March 31st, 2008.

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 14 31 March 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 22:08, 2 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Where to find information about Wikipedia on Wikipedia

Thanks. It should be possible here to do that.Vchimpanzee · talk · contributions · 18:10, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Our band site

Thanks for your reply Stwalkerster

It is the band Shy June

This is what the page looked like...

removed - you didn't need to give me that, all I wanted was the name of the page - I can see the deleted revisions :) But thanks anyway. Stwalkerstertalk ] 18:28, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry Stwalkerster - I got a bit carried away :-) - it just really bugged me, we were removed yesterday for copyright infringemant which seems like an excuse when we own the copyright of our own material.

Any advice? Stuart Denney (talk) 18:36, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


How would you recommend we showed the importance of the page?

Stuart Denney (talk) 18:43, 3 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This is a reply to message you left on my talk page.

I put up two links to self-published articles unaware of the policy against them. My posting privileges were suspended and the links were taken down. I have no problem with that. Rules is rules. The problem is that every link I've ever posted to Wikipedia has been taken down too, links that WEREN'T self published, links that broke no rules.

Now that I've regained my posting privileges, how do I get the old links back? Would it be proper for me to undo the deletes?

Noahveil (talk) 16:07, 4 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


You were involved with an article of mine recently so I figure you'd be a good person to ask. What happens if a major contributor to a University club article deemed as non-notable by others per an AfD goes to Internet forums and message boards of said subject and tries to "throw" the vote? Isn't this against Wikipedia policy?

Here's what I'm talking about: http://pittsburgh.rivals.com/showmsg.asp?fid=538&mid=113090765&sid=996&tid=113090765&style=1

BroadSt Bully (talk) 03:38, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

WP:CANVASS covers this. Stwalkerstertalk ] 13:52, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I have left a note on the AfD regarding the canvassing. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 13:55, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks for thinking about keeping my talk page clean, but I tend to archive threads on my talk page, not blank them off. This thread will be archived when the time is right. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 16:57, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

X-treme Geek

Hi-I had created the "X-treme Geek" page, I see why you deleted it; not wikipedia-worthy. Thanks, rishi Rishi.bedi (talk) 22:16, 6 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

schools

Question. When I come across a speedy for a middle school or elementary school, I of course remove it--but I usually put on a prod or a merge tag unless there's something special. I see you dont often do that--am I perhaps being too aggressive or are you? DGG (talk) 02:24, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It's probably me being too much of a deletionist :P Stwalkerstertalk ] 17:44, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NCTSA

I am wondering why you deleted the NCTSA page. I know your reasons are that it is not a large enough TSA chapter but NCTSA has over 60 chapters and many members. I also question your authority to make a decision on the matter. Do you even know what TSA is. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 71.65.204.244 (talk) 02:57, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I deleted that page because it had been underr WP:PROD for 5 days - if you wanted to contest the deletion, you should have done so in that time. You might want to take it to WP:DRV. Stwalkerstertalk ] 09:04, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
FYI, the article is indeed up for discussion at DRV. (71.65.204.244 put the notification template on the DRV page instead of here.) Deor (talk) 01:25, 8 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Prod deletion

Hi, you forgot Talk:Factory Expo Home Centers, when you deleted the article. Thanks! --Rocksanddirt (talk) 16:43, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Gone. If you notice any other orphaned talk pages, they are speedily deletable under criterion G8 of WP:CSD - just tag it, and any admin can come along and delete it. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 17:31, 7 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I was just patrolling the Charlotte page and I have done a lot of work to that particular page. I noticed that you deleted my sub page and then renamed it. I would appreciate that if an action like that needs to take place that you or someone else fix the link that points to the new appointed page. As I looked at it, it was turned into a red link. I have now changed the link and directed it to the right page. I think one needs to be careful to do a complete follow thru. I appreciate it. Canyouhearmenow 22:55, 9 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

i have an account with wikipedia know. Thanks for the message. Okli dokli, talk 2 ya later —Preceding unsigned comment added by Sgt Sharpe (talkcontribs) 21:28, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

Hello Stwalkerster, I heard you were an admin and I'd like to ask you for rollback. I've been doing a bit of anti-vandal work wit Lupin's anti vandal tool but I keep getting edit conflicts when I save, and I heard this does it automatically, so I won't get them in future. Thanks :-)--Jaeger123 (talk) 18:15, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

It doesn't prevent edit conflicts, but tends to be faster, so you won't get them as often, or you'll be making everyone else get edit conflicts. Done. Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:29, 13 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Tom Welch

I am a bit upset to see you have deleted Tom Welch's page supposedly because he is a "non-notable footballer". This is really in no way a reflection of the truth. Any chance you can put it back again please ? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 89.224.126.8 (talk) 21:28, 16 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The article was proposed for deletion for 5 days, you could have contested the deletioin during that period. Feel free to take it to WP:DRV, or if you can provide a good reason as to why the article should be undeleted, just give me a reply here. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 17:44, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Signpost updated for April 7th and 14th, 2008.

Sorry, it seems that the bot quit before completing its run last week. Here is the last two weeks' worth of Signpost. Ralbot (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Signpost
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 15 7 April 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Volume 4, Issue 16 14 April 2008 About the Signpost

Template:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-sTemplate:S-s

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:16, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake?

ummm.. I think this was a mistake because you just restored the vandalism I reverted. Just wanted to let you know because huggle seems to be kind of "unbalanced" today and it's been doing weird stuff. Thingg 18:20, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Reporting vandalism?

Sorry to be such a bother, but I've been trying to report vandalism, and I've looked through loads of pages to find it... <(^__^)> thanks! 05hepburn3 (talk) 19:10, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi! You might find some of the advice at WP:CUV useful. :) Stwalkerstertalk ] 19:12, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

=D how typical... that small box on the side of almsot all the pages I checked... lmao - thanks again!

Thank You

Thank you for blocking this user for two months as he kept redoing the vandalism I reverted. Thank you and well done in your new position as administrator. --FGWQPR (talk) 19:14, 17 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

New pages

Sorry, it's me again... I was just wondering, I'm looking at the page http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:REQUEST, as I'm trying to request for a new page to be added... =S it doesn't fit into any of the categories though, but I've found another page on wikipedia which is on a similar subject... any help? (let me guess... another one of those side links!) <(^__^)>