Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Asheron's Call Friends: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
→[[Asheron's Call Friends]]: delete as not-notable vanity |
|||
| Line 16: | Line 16: | ||
*'''Delete''' off-topic forum articles, especially when they belong to the less-successful fansites of dying MMORPGs. [[Asheron's Call]] is notable, your forum is not. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In Black]] ([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|Contribs]]) 05:21, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' off-topic forum articles, especially when they belong to the less-successful fansites of dying MMORPGs. [[Asheron's Call]] is notable, your forum is not. - [[User:A Man In Black|A Man In Black]] ([[User talk:A_Man_In_Black|Talk]] | [[Special:Contributions/A Man In Black|Contribs]]) 05:21, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Delete''' not notable online community. The photo lends support to the vanity assertion as well. By the way, the photo should probably go as well as it does not add anything to the article and I cannot imagine it being useful in any other article. [[User:Tobycat|Tobycat]] 06:14, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
*'''Delete''' not notable online community. The photo lends support to the vanity assertion as well. By the way, the photo should probably go as well as it does not add anything to the article and I cannot imagine it being useful in any other article. [[User:Tobycat|Tobycat]] 06:14, 9 August 2005 (UTC) |
||
*'''Keep'''. |
|||
Revision as of 16:21, 10 August 2005
Completely nn, vanity, etc. Delete. RasputinAXP talk * contribs 04:15, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. It's getting completely ridiculous. Carson.Talk 04:23, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. nn vanity →ubεr nεmo→ lóquï 06:11, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- LOL. That was pretty funny. Delete of course, for reasons already stated.—Encephalon | ζ | Σ 10:52:31, 2005-08-08 (UTC)
- Keep. Interesting and comprehensive. Voyager640 16:06, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete, we don't need a page for every nn BB community. The article's tone also makes me believe it's a joke.-128.249.162.120 16:29, 8 August 2005 (UTC) That was me, forgot to sign in. -D. Wu 16:31, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Original and informative, still evolving (Unsigned vote by 159.18.94.65 (talk · contribs))
- Delete. Funny, but not good enough to keep in an encyclopedia Tcwd 21:25, 8 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete. I even post there and I want this deleted. It would take a lot more than some copy editing to clean up this article. there is so much pointless material. ACF is not a famous forum that deserves it's own Wikipedia article. --Chupon 21:28, August 8, 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. It's awesome and informative. (Unsigned vote by 67.182.206.253 (talk · contribs), first edit)
- Lock, no, wait, delete. Sabine's Sunbird 00:23, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete nn forum vanity. --Etacar11 00:39, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep. Information is something to keep not destroy, whether it's riveting or fanciful. ACF has been the driving board for Vault and IGN and is currently the most posted board according to the lists. Whether it's place in the scheme of world events is small, it's still and informative article on a sub-culture of the still evolving internet society. Kcferret
- By that rationale, every board deserves a page on Wikipedia. There is, however greater precedent in favor of delete. See Wikipedia:Votes_for_deletion/Precedents RasputinAXP talk * contribs 02:35, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete off-topic forum articles, especially when they belong to the less-successful fansites of dying MMORPGs. Asheron's Call is notable, your forum is not. - A Man In Black (Talk | Contribs) 05:21, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Delete not notable online community. The photo lends support to the vanity assertion as well. By the way, the photo should probably go as well as it does not add anything to the article and I cannot imagine it being useful in any other article. Tobycat 06:14, 9 August 2005 (UTC)
- Keep.