Jump to content

Talk:Lochwinnoch: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
No edit summary
Line 26: Line 26:


Please note - The Village Website is NOT a commercial site in any shape or form. No payment is received and no profit made from running or being associated with the site. ([[User:Bwiseman|Bwiseman]] ([[User talk:Bwiseman|talk]]) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC))
Please note - The Village Website is NOT a commercial site in any shape or form. No payment is received and no profit made from running or being associated with the site. ([[User:Bwiseman|Bwiseman]] ([[User talk:Bwiseman|talk]]) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC))

---
It is about time. ([[User:EddyFictitious|Eddy Fictitious]]

Revision as of 19:44, 23 April 2008

Stop changing this page if you are not being productive, you freaks.

---

Please stop posting inaccurate and defamatory comments

Bwiseman (talk) 06:22, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Which Parts of the Article are innaccurate and I will willingly excise them.

Frenum McSpleen (talk) 09:21, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

---

The comments which have been removed are not intended to improve the village wikipedia entry but are aimed to cause disruption and extend a local grievance. Disagreements should not be brought into wikipedia. (Bwiseman (talk) 12:13, 22 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

Very simple: anything that is not verified will be removed. Unless your village website is some sort of significant community project, then I doubt it has been mentioned in any third party publications. If it has, then we can get on to discussing notability, which I rather feel it would fail again.
At the moment, it is gone, vanished. There's your solution. --Breadandcheese (talk) 12:53, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
I think you will find that the site is a "significant community project" and does meet criteria 2 of notability for having won the Calor Scottish Community of The Year competition on several occasions. Java Jockey (talk) 19:56, 22 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Yes and all of the claims with made by the various editors are verifiable by the contents of the site itself Frenum McSpleen (talk) 20:40, 22 April 2008 (UTC) ---[reply]

Please note - The Village Website is NOT a commercial site in any shape or form. No payment is received and no profit made from running or being associated with the site. (Bwiseman (talk) 17:16, 22 April 2008 (UTC))[reply]

--- It is about time. (Eddy Fictitious