User talk:Rldavisiv: Difference between revisions
→User name block: new section |
|||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
Why didn't you simply change your user name? Now you are creating more headaches for yourself. Wikipedia users operate transparently; sock puppets are strongly discouraged unless the practice fits with our policies and the socks are openly revealed without any effort to use them abusively. I cannot change your user name for you (admins with special privileges perform these functions on the referenced notice board). You should have followed the instructions within the unblock message and then your account would have been properly updated. Now it again appears that you wish to behave surreptitiously, or impatiently, and behave as a [[WP:SPA|single-purpose account]]. If you had remained transparent and operated with our community's guidelines, I would have supported your efforts to contribute. Even so, your submissions may very well remain as part of the project, but unless I see some actions that back up the reasonable responses I've gotten from you via email, I'm going to support whatever actions other administrators choose to take in connection with your disregard for our policies and procedures. - <font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]] <sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony|talk]]</sub></font> 20:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
Why didn't you simply change your user name? Now you are creating more headaches for yourself. Wikipedia users operate transparently; sock puppets are strongly discouraged unless the practice fits with our policies and the socks are openly revealed without any effort to use them abusively. I cannot change your user name for you (admins with special privileges perform these functions on the referenced notice board). You should have followed the instructions within the unblock message and then your account would have been properly updated. Now it again appears that you wish to behave surreptitiously, or impatiently, and behave as a [[WP:SPA|single-purpose account]]. If you had remained transparent and operated with our community's guidelines, I would have supported your efforts to contribute. Even so, your submissions may very well remain as part of the project, but unless I see some actions that back up the reasonable responses I've gotten from you via email, I'm going to support whatever actions other administrators choose to take in connection with your disregard for our policies and procedures. - <font face="Verdana">[[User:Cobaltbluetony|CobaltBlueTony™]] <sub>[[User_talk:Cobaltbluetony|talk]]</sub></font> 20:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC) |
||
---- |
|||
Please see the main user account and corresponding 'talk' page for an integrated review of the 'dialogue'. |
|||
--[[Special:Contributions/75.104.157.17|75.104.157.17]] ([[User talk:75.104.157.17|talk]]) 23:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 23:32, 25 April 2008
April 2008
Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Landon Garland, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Landon Garland was changed by Rldavisiv (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-22T05:32:37+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:32, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Most interesting as this is the comment received when I wrote the article in the first place. Perhaps automated 'editors' cannot discern the difference.
--Rldavisiv (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Timothy Wyllie. Your edits have been automatically marked as unconstructive/possible vandalism and have been automatically reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Timothy Wyllie was changed by Rldavisiv (u) (t) blanking the page on 2008-04-22T05:33:01+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:33, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Most interesting as this is the comment received when I wrote the article in the first place. Perhaps automated 'editors' cannot discern the difference.
--Rldavisiv (talk) 05:36, 22 April 2008 (UTC)
Sockpuppetry case
|
You have been accused of sockpuppetry. Please refer to Wikipedia:Suspected sock puppets/Daynal for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with notes for the suspect before editing the evidence page. Pastordavid (talk) 20:44, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
User name block
Why didn't you simply change your user name? Now you are creating more headaches for yourself. Wikipedia users operate transparently; sock puppets are strongly discouraged unless the practice fits with our policies and the socks are openly revealed without any effort to use them abusively. I cannot change your user name for you (admins with special privileges perform these functions on the referenced notice board). You should have followed the instructions within the unblock message and then your account would have been properly updated. Now it again appears that you wish to behave surreptitiously, or impatiently, and behave as a single-purpose account. If you had remained transparent and operated with our community's guidelines, I would have supported your efforts to contribute. Even so, your submissions may very well remain as part of the project, but unless I see some actions that back up the reasonable responses I've gotten from you via email, I'm going to support whatever actions other administrators choose to take in connection with your disregard for our policies and procedures. - CobaltBlueTony™ talk 20:54, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
Please see the main user account and corresponding 'talk' page for an integrated review of the 'dialogue'. --75.104.157.17 (talk) 23:32, 25 April 2008 (UTC)