Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bloomhead: Difference between revisions

Content deleted Content added

Inline

Revision as of 19:59, 27 April 2008

Bloomhead

Previously speeded under A7 and has now been created, so off to AfD this article with no claims of notability, covering an organization with no significant secondary-source coverage, goes. Badger Drink (talk) 05:34, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Delete lovely spam wonderful spam. JuJube (talk) 07:23, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete it'd be prod except the article was created with a hangon tag! Someone clue them in... Potatoswatter (talk) 08:04, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
- Really, shouldn't there be a better process for this? Potatoswatter (talk) 08:05, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete Per above. It's just spam. -- Qaddosh|^talk|contribs 09:45, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. --JulesN Talk 10:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]
Delete, pretty shameless spam. Lankiveil ^{(speak to me)} 11:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC).[reply]
Delete - pure corporate spam. Doc Tropics 19:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

@@ Line 10: / Line 10: @@
 *'''Delete''' per nom. --[[User:Julesn84|<b><font color="#4AA02C">JulesN</font></b>]] [[User_talk:Julesn84|<b><font color="#461B7E">Talk</font></b>]] 10:36, 24 April 2008 (UTC)
 *'''Delete''', pretty shameless spam.  [[User:Lankiveil|Lankiveil]] <sup>([[User talk:Lankiveil|speak to me]])</sup> 11:40, 24 April 2008 (UTC).
+*'''Delete''' - pure corporate spam. [[User:Doc Tropics|Doc ]] <font color ="green">[[User talk:Doc Tropics|Tropics]]</font > 19:59, 27 April 2008 (UTC)