Talk:Alexander von Humboldt

Founder of biogeography

I don't have a problem with the biogeography statement in principle, but the same would apply to a number of other disciplines as well. I think it should not go into the opening statemet, otherwise all other fields he founded would have to be mentioned as well. It would be better under a separate, new statement like summary of achievements. --Carboxen 07:26, 17 January 2006 (UTC)

"Introduction"

Everything in the so-called introduction, things and places named after him etc., should come at the end, after the actual biography. Any reason this section is where it is now? u p p l a n d 13:03, 3 June 2006 (UTC)

• I agree with you and moved that so-called introduction to the end of the article. Thanks, Madman 22:39, 4 June 2006 (UTC)

Humboldt or von Humboldt??

Sometimes in the article Alexander is referred to as Humboldt and other times as von Humboldt. We should standardize, but I don't know the rules that apply here. Madman 01:33, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

For all I know, von Humboldt is preferable, because, strictly speaking, as in many other cases with nobility, it is equivalent to from or of Humboldt referring to the family castle (sometimes only imaginary, as it was in the case of von Linné). Taking von out of this combination we not only deny their noble status (which may well fit the egalitarian Zeitgeist of the 21st century) but also make some slight but meaningful difference (just like calling me Alexei St Petersburg instead of Alexei from/of St Petersburg). Calling him consistently by one of his personal names (Alexander) would be, probably, even better, but this will be too bold.

Nobility is largely an ancien regime institution and this cultural distance makes all the tricks less understandable for us. However if we eradicate all the clues, we undermine the very possibility to understand them at all. Alexei Kouprianov 07:12, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

I'm not sure if I understand you correctly, but it is quite normal to leave out the von when just mentioning the person by surname. (Think of Bismarck, Hindenburg, etc.) Insisting on using the von in such cases will just seem affected. When using given name and surname together, the von should always be included, unless the person him/herself didn't use it, or one is referring to a time before the person was ennobled. u p p l a n d 10:44, 5 June 2006 (UTC)

Misleading information

According to a book I’ve read, the first person to propose that the lands bordering the Atlantic were once joined (South America and Africa in particular), was actually a Dutch map-maker Abraham Orelius in 1596. The book also asserts that the second person to claim this was Sir Fancis Bacon in 1620. Perhaps the statement (“first to propose that the lands bordering the Atlantic were once joined”) is too vague and is thus incorrect. I will not remove it because I am unsure of the specifics; but if anyone else agrees, then reword or remove it. TDBSW 17:33, 30 September 2006 (UTC)

Umm … I’m too impatient, I just reworded it; change it back if you like. Perhaps he was the first form his country to propose this, but I just changed it to “one of the first”. TDBSW 07:50, 1 October 2006 (UTC)

POV/Citation Issues

Though well written, the article is absolutely filled with value judgements that really have no place in wikipeida. The most glaring one comes at the end of the article:

'After every deduction has been made, he yet stands before us as a colossal figure, not unworthy to take his place beside Goethe as the representative of the scientific side of the culture of his country.'

If someone notable said it, or there's some sort of reputable source conveying a similar sentiment, I think the article would be improved by leaving it. However, if it's just a personal assessment, it (regretably) needs to be removed, along with the other POV statements. I'll do some research on it and be back in a few days hence, either to add proper citation or delete unsourced/unsourcable statements. Anyone with similar (or different) inclinations is welcome to assist. Detruncate 04:12, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

That line sounds like it came from the 1911 Encyclopedia Brittanica, which was the starting point for this article. You should feel free to just instantly nuke stuff like that.--ragesoss 04:14, 6 May 2007 (UTC)

Fair use rationale for Image:1964-DDR-5.jpg

Image:1964-DDR-5.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot (talk) 04:57, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

Alexander von Humboldt Portal: Google Earth/ Wikipedia global

http://de.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kosmos_%28Humboldt%29

"„Ich habe den tollen Einfall, die ganze materielle Welt, alles was wir heute von den Erscheinungen der Himmelsräume und des Erdenlebens, von den Nebelsternen bis zur Geographie der Moose auf den Granitfelsen, wissen, alles in Einem Werke darzustellen, und in einem Werke, das zugleich in lebendiger Sprache anregt und das Gemüth ergötzt. Jede große und wichtige Idee, die irgendwo aufgeglimmt, muß neben den Thatsachen hier verzeichnet sein. Es muß eine Epoche der geistigen Entwickelung der Menschheit (in ihrem Wissen von der Natur) darstellen.“ „Das Ganze ist nicht was man gemeinhin physikalische Erdbeschreibung nennt, es begreift Himmel und Erde, alles Geschaffene.“(Humboldt an Karl August Varnhagen von Ense, Berlin, 24. Oktober 1834. In: Briefe von Alexander von Humboldt an Varnhagen von Ense aus den Jahren 1827 bis 1858. [Hrsg. v. Ludmilla Assing]. Leipzig: F. A. Brockhaus 1860, S. 20 und 22.)"