Jump to content

User talk:Rocksblame: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
some points: new section
comment
 
Line 6: Line 6:


b) as per the disclaimer, we're not supposed to give medical advice. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 23:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
b) as per the disclaimer, we're not supposed to give medical advice. [[User:DragonflySixtyseven|DS]] ([[User talk:DragonflySixtyseven|talk]]) 23:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

I'll also add that it appears some of the content has been taken from the medical guidance for the drug, I'm assuming from the patience guidance note that can often be found inside the packet, and that being the case, it could make the article a copyright problem. We're not a medical encyclopedia, just a general compendium, so whilst it's nice to have information on the drug, we don't need to have a mass of information targeted at patients. [[User:Nick|Nick]] ([[User talk:Nick|talk]]) 23:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

Latest revision as of 23:36, 1 May 2008

Please don't try to spam Wikipedia. The article has not been deleted, but it has been brutally trimmed. DS (talk) 14:28, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

some points

[edit]

a) Don't revert changes wholesale. Calling it "1,3,7-trimethylxanthine" is pointless when you could call it "caffeine", for instance.

b) as per the disclaimer, we're not supposed to give medical advice. DS (talk) 23:25, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I'll also add that it appears some of the content has been taken from the medical guidance for the drug, I'm assuming from the patience guidance note that can often be found inside the packet, and that being the case, it could make the article a copyright problem. We're not a medical encyclopedia, just a general compendium, so whilst it's nice to have information on the drug, we don't need to have a mass of information targeted at patients. Nick (talk) 23:36, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]