Jump to content

User talk:BJBot: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Dravecky (talk | contribs)
hey: new section
Line 53: Line 53:
This image was in use by and linked to the [[WVQZ]] article within five minutes of being uploaded so I don't understand why over eighteen hours later that the bot would tag it as "orphaned" and prime for deletion. I see from other comments that this is far from the only false positive by this bot. - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 23:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
This image was in use by and linked to the [[WVQZ]] article within five minutes of being uploaded so I don't understand why over eighteen hours later that the bot would tag it as "orphaned" and prime for deletion. I see from other comments that this is far from the only false positive by this bot. - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 23:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
*Update: It appears some jackhole vandal had blanked the page when the bot came sniffing around. - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 23:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)
*Update: It appears some jackhole vandal had blanked the page when the bot came sniffing around. - [[User:Dravecky|Dravecky]] ([[User talk:Dravecky|talk]]) 23:44, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

== hey ==

you removed image:guaranteedcover but it was in use on www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaranteed_(phatfish album) ???

im confused as to whats happened or what the problem is :)

Revision as of 16:12, 2 May 2008

Image deletion

Please delete Image:SmegService1.jpg - no longer required.

Thanks, Mynameispritch (talk) 13:28, 29 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Brethren of Datu Abdillah

A bit confused here, why is it Brethren of Datu Abdillah is categorized for deletion? No one knows if it is real or not, and there are a few similar fraternities listed in Wikipedia in which the existence of such associations are debatable but the articles are not categorized for deletion. This article has provided hoax allegation section in its article, why is it then that this article is concluded as a hoax?

Nobody else

you can remove Image:Nobody else.jpg as it not used on the page it was when i uploaded and there is another version of the cover now.

Image:WOTW-NYT-headline.jpg tagged as orphan. It was not.

This is the second time this has happened.

I have no idea why MediaWiki keeps deciding that my image is orphaned, but it's not, it never was, and I don't know what else to say about it.

Image:WOTW-NYT-headline.jpg is used in The War of the Worlds (radio), and has been for some time.

If you could tell my why it's not showing up on the image page, I'd be your bestest friend, but for now, I'd just ask that you don't delete the image, and tell however many other bots there are floating around that do exactly what this bot and Betacommandbot do not to delete the image.

Please. superlusertc 2008 April 18, 07:13 (UTC)

Please feel free to remove it as the article it was being used on has been merged with another so it's quite un-needed on Wikipedia now. Jammy (talk)

Image:Bridge opening official booklet.jpg.

There is a message about this on my page stating that the pic is orphaned. It isn't orphaned. It is currently in use at Sydney Harbour Bridge. Amandajm (talk) 01:29, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Black widow film.jpg

The image that BJBot detected as no longer in use had simply been removed from its intended article by an act of vandalism, or similar. A previous version of the article has now been restored and the image is once again returned to gainful employment. Thanks. Brittle heaven (talk) 19:34, 30 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]


Image:LimeExchangeScreenshot.jpg

Please delete, agreed ! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Rajshpec (talkcontribs) 13:34, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:WVQZ logo.png

This image was in use by and linked to the WVQZ article within five minutes of being uploaded so I don't understand why over eighteen hours later that the bot would tag it as "orphaned" and prime for deletion. I see from other comments that this is far from the only false positive by this bot. - Dravecky (talk) 23:37, 1 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

hey

you removed image:guaranteedcover but it was in use on www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Guaranteed_(phatfish album) ???

im confused as to whats happened or what the problem is :)