Talk:Bob Woodward: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
m Talk:Bob Woodward moved to Talk:Bob Woodward on wheels! |
(No difference)
|
Revision as of 18:53, 15 August 2005
--Zoot91 20:39, 29 Oct 2004 (UTC)
A few comments on edits made to the Style & Criticism section of the Bob Woodward article:
- The existing version was correct in pointing out several major criticisms of Woodward's style. However, I found little or no effort to balance this with positive statements reflecting the wide readership Woodward attracts or the attention paid to his works in Washington and around the world.
- I added one frequent criticism of Woodward that had not yet been mentioned: that some journalists believe his frequent use of background sources discourages other people, especially in government, from speaking on the record.
- "Delay" and "Fraud" did not seem to be neutral subheadings, so I combined those sections into the new "Style & Criticism" subheading. Delay was a short paragraph to begin with.
- The use of six New York Review of Books citations (but no others) makes for a decidedly non-NPOV. Rather than start a tit-for-tat of "review quotes," which often say more about the reviewer's own beliefs than the work in question, I thought it best to remove all but one representative negative and positive citation.
- An encyclopedia article, even a Wiki article, seems a less than perfect venue for making detailed critiques of specific scenes in books, some of which date back 25 years. If they must be made, why not do so in a new article specifically about the book in question, and aim for a balanced POV.
- As far as I know, NPOV does not require removing factual attributed information in order to meet some conception of "balance". AaronSw 02:59, 12 Dec 2004 (UTC)
The DVD of "All the President's Men" says Bob Woodward was born in 1944. From all other sources I could find, the wikipedia article is using the correct date correct date, March 26, 1943. Just thought it should be noted that this alternate date appears.
-tristanreid
who is Deep Throat
Updates on the Vanity Fair article should go in the Deep Throat article, not here, and need to be kept in an encyclopedia form - e.g., don't start them with "UPDATE"! - DavidWBrooks 17:41, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
- I'm not getting into a revert war with some WikiNazi, so I'm not touching the article. But you're wrong. Woodward himself has confirmed Felt = Deep Throat, so the article's bit about protecting Deep Throat's identity needs to be updated. Check the WashPost front page.
- Ever heard the 'net rule about "Nazi" in discussions? Oh, never mind ... (By the way, Woodward had not confirmed anything when the original change was made.) - DavidWBrooks 23:53, 31 May 2005 (UTC)
This Page should be Frozen
Right now with all the press surrounding the duo, it seems to keep suffering from graffiti. For a little bit, maybe this page should not be editable by all.