Talk:Abbey Mills Mosque

Category

This seems to fit, but in case I'm wrong remember it's important to be reasonable and civil when using Category:Anti-Islam sentiment or any such category.--T. Anthony (talk) 20:02, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

absolutely not. That is pure POV. The opposition is not discriminatory. Yahel Guhan 05:57, 15 January 2008 (UTC)

Image

The image is Mangera's, and he is no longer associated with the project. There neither a valid claim of fair use nor a valid reason for that image to be here. -- Avi (talk) 18:11, 16 January 2008 (UTC)

GA on hold

• Newspapers in refs (eg. The Daily Telegraph) need to be in italics
  •  Done
• "as a plan for a “mega-mosque.”" - why bold?
  • Because it is the most common reference to the project in the press. -- Avi (talk) 16:05, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
• "The Daily Telegraph reported that it was expected" - again, needs italics?
  •  Done
• "did not choose Mangera's design for the final plan, deciding on a scaled-down structure.[11] Instead, the mosque's trustees appointed the firm of Allies and Morrison to design the mosque." - this gets confused half way through about who was rejected and who was accepted.
  •  Done
• "Concerns have also been raised" - "also" not necessary
  •  Done
• Tablighi Jamaat only needs to be wlinked once or twice in the article; same with common words like Islam, Alan Craig, etc.
  •  Done
• Not sure where the Public relations section fits in...(just personally)
  • I thought it was interesting that the mosque decided to engage a PR firm which has set up a professional website and YouTube page. So did the press :) -- Avi (talk) 16:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
    • Makes sense. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)
• "In July of 2007" --> In July 2007, "In September of 2007" --> In September 2007
  •  Done
• "until November of 2007" --> until November 2007
  •  Done
• "when the link was removed" - this is evident as you provide an "until" date, so you can remove these words
  •  Done

An interesting read. Please leave a note on my talk page when done with this. Cheers, dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 07:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)

Passed. dihydrogen monoxide (H₂O) 05:29, 15 March 2008 (UTC)

Thank you. -- Avi (talk) 02:54, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

Peer review

I would like and try to take this to WP:FAC, so I have opened a peer review request as shown above. There have been some excellent suggestions already, and I'm looking forward to more constructive criticism on the article. -- Avi (talk) 00:40, 30 April 2008 (UTC)