Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimini bay: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
m Creating deletion discussion page for Bimini bay. using TW |
→Bimini bay: merge |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
:{{la|Bimini bay}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Bimini bay|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimini bay]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimini bay|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 May 14#{{anchorencode:Bimini bay}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
:{{la|Bimini bay}} (<span class="plainlinks">[{{fullurl:Bimini bay|wpReason={{urlencode:AfD discussion: [[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimini bay]]}}&action=delete}} delete]</span>) – <includeonly>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bimini bay|View AfD]])</includeonly><noinclude>([[Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2008 May 14#{{anchorencode:Bimini bay}}|View log]])</noinclude> |
||
Non-notable "development". [[User:Rbanzai|Rob Banzai]] ([[User talk:Rbanzai|talk]]) 16:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
Non-notable "development". [[User:Rbanzai|Rob Banzai]] ([[User talk:Rbanzai|talk]]) 16:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
||
*'''merge''' to [[Holmes Beach, Florida]]. It is notable enough for it's own article: it appears on Multimap, and as such meets the requirements of [[WP:NPT]], However, there is nothing of any real note in the article as it stands, so for the time being should be placed in a parent article until it grows up. [[User:StephenBuxton|StephenBuxton]] ([[User talk:StephenBuxton|talk]]) 16:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 16:40, 14 May 2008
- Bimini bay (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) (delete) – (View log)
Non-notable "development". Rob Banzai (talk) 16:33, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
- merge to Holmes Beach, Florida. It is notable enough for it's own article: it appears on Multimap, and as such meets the requirements of WP:NPT, However, there is nothing of any real note in the article as it stands, so for the time being should be placed in a parent article until it grows up. StephenBuxton (talk) 16:40, 14 May 2008 (UTC)