Jump to content

User talk:69.204.219.222: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
No edit summary
 
No edit summary
Line 3: Line 3:
==simple links==
==simple links==


Hello. Please note that you don't need to write <nowiki>[[incidence structure|incidence structures]], since [[incidence structure]]s accomplishes exactly the same thing. Similarly [[hyphen]]ated, [[Austria]]n, [[logic]]al, [[rabbi]]nical, [[apocrypha]]l, [[dog]]s, etc. Only for [[incidence geometry|incidence geometries]] and the like does one need the more complicated form. ~~~~</nowiki>
Hello. Please note that you don't need to write <nowiki>[[incidence structure|incidence structures]], since [[incidence structure]]s accomplishes exactly the same thing. Similarly [[hyphen]]ated, [[Austria]]n, [[logic]]al, [[rabbi]]nical, [[apocrypha]]l, [[dogma]]tic, etc. Only for [[incidence geometry|incidence geometries]]</nowiki> and the like does one need the more complicated form. [[User:Michael Hardy|Michael Hardy]] 20:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC)

Revision as of 20:23, 17 August 2005

Welcome!

Hi 69.204.219.222! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing!

Hello. Please note that you don't need to write [[incidence structure|incidence structures]], since [[incidence structure]]s accomplishes exactly the same thing. Similarly [[hyphen]]ated, [[Austria]]n, [[logic]]al, [[rabbi]]nical, [[apocrypha]]l, [[dogma]]tic, etc. Only for [[incidence geometry|incidence geometries]] and the like does one need the more complicated form. Michael Hardy 20:23, 17 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]