User talk:Eremia: Difference between revisions
Line 117: | Line 117: | ||
== I do not know much about categories, so I will not stop you. '''BUT''', if someone undoes your edits, do not simply put them back. Instead, ask them for an explanation on their talk page. Thank you. --[[User:Barneca|barneca]] ([[User talk:Barneca|talk]]) 21:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
== I will [[TRY]] , but I am imperfect , I do not know all the rules ! |
|||
== [[Eremia]] ! == |
|||
Finally , I need 2 accounts , but only 2 ! |
|||
[[User:Eremia|Eremia]] and [[User:Alexandra Eremia|Alexandra Eremia]] ! |
|||
I can use the both ! |
|||
I have [[Eremia]] but , can you unblock [[Alexandra Eremia]] , just ONE ! |
|||
With 1 , this is so diffcult ! |
|||
With 2 , this is more easy ! |
|||
[[User:Eremia|Eremia]] ([[User talk:Eremia|talk]]) 22:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)[[User:Roger Parslow|Roger Parslow]] |
Revision as of 22:37, 14 May 2008
Welcome!
|
Categories
Hi Eremia,
You have been adding a lot of categories to articles, but often they are already in a subcategory of that category. For example, category:mind sports is a subcategory of both category:games and category:sports. So any article that is in category mind sports should not also be put in either category sports or category games. By being in a subcategory, they are automatically also in the parent category.
See Wikipedia:Category for information on categorization. The guideline that subcategory articles should not also be in the parent category can be found at point 3 of Wikipedia:Category#Some_general_guidelines. Regards, HermanHiddema (talk) 07:45, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
A way to stop the cycle of blocked accounts and reverted edits
Hello.
You have been creating multiple accounts which have been:
- vandalizing other users' talk pages
- claiming to be administrators
- repeatedly changing most references to card games and board games to card sports and board sports
- making other, unrelated, useful additions to various articles.
The first two items, obviously, are disruptive, and have caused your accounts to be blocked from editing. The last item is great. The third item is a "content dispute". If you wish to have any of these changes stay, and not be reverted, you are going to have to convince others that this is correct. The way to do this is thru dispute resolution. The first step of dispute resolution is discussion on the article's talk page.
New accounts you create that vandalize are blockable on sight without warning. Because you are refusing to discuss these changes with other people, new accounts that you create, that continue to make these changes without discussion, will also be blocked without warning, even if they are not used to vandalize.
Important
If you limit yourself to just one account, stop vandalizing, and start discussing these changes on an article's talk page, I will leave that one account unblocked. If you continue to create multiple accounts, or if you don't discuss your changes with people, all of your accounts will be blocked as they are discovered, whether or not that particular account is disruptive, and whether or not you are participating in discussions with that account.
Please ask me here, or on my talk page, if you have any questions. If I don't respond, please place {{helpme}} on your talk page, and someone will come by to help you. But please do not create any more alternate accounts if you want your ideas to be taken seriously. --barneca (talk) (see note @ top of my talk if I don't reply) 21:12, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
- I need only 3 three accounts , Eremia , Alexandra Eremia , and Parslow ! I finish vandalism , I will TRY for discussions , and If Parslow don't exists , I will create it ! Thanks ! It was valable only for all the wikis , excepted , in French wiki ! But I am not perfect ! I can have 3 accounts !
Discussion
I'm very happy you have decided to stop vandalizing. Thank you.
If you are editing the same articles, and because of how you have handled multiple accounts, you should only have one account. Why do you want three diffferent accounts?
And please stop changing "Pan American" to "Panamerican" everywhere without discussing it somewhere! I do not think people are going to agree to this change. Please ask on Talk:Pan American Games, and wait for people to decide before changing any more.
Thank you. --barneca (talk) 17:29, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Last try
I do not know how else to say this. You cannot make changes just because you want to, you need to talk with others, and do what everyone agrees, even if you think it is wrong. You just moved Pan American to Panamerican again, after your previous move was undone, and you were given an explanation. You just re-added a category to Backgammon again, after your previous addition was undone, and you were given an explanation. And you just re-created the Category:Tables sports again after your previous creation was undone, and you were given an explanation. I am sorry, I do not know what else to do. If you do any of these things again, or things like them again, I will block this account, and all your accounts I find, indefinitely. --barneca (talk) 21:41, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
But this was the last time ! I will not begin moving " Pan American Games " ! I stop this !
I would like to make a new category with sport practised with a table ! Like table tennis , cue sports , carrom , and backgammon ! This category includes = 1 Table tennis !
2 Cue sports ! 3 Carrom ! 4 Backgammon !
== I do not know much about categories, so I will not stop you. BUT, if someone undoes your edits, do not simply put them back. Instead, ask them for an explanation on their talk page. Thank you. --barneca (talk) 21:56, 14 May 2008 (UTC)
== I will TRY , but I am imperfect , I do not know all the rules !
Eremia !
Finally , I need 2 accounts , but only 2 ! Eremia and Alexandra Eremia ! I can use the both ! I have Eremia but , can you unblock Alexandra Eremia , just ONE ! With 1 , this is so diffcult ! With 2 , this is more easy ! Eremia (talk) 22:30, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Roger Parslow