Talk:The Theory of Communicative Action: Difference between revisions
m some information on my edit |
m Dating comment by Szczels - "some information on my edit" |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
It may seem long for a Wikipedia entry but I argue that the two volumes of TCA are also very long and densely argued and it is impossible to do justice to this work and be very brief. My summary does leave out many parts of Habermas argument especially with the tradition of Sociology. But hopefully the key arguments are rendered faithfully for common edification. |
It may seem long for a Wikipedia entry but I argue that the two volumes of TCA are also very long and densely argued and it is impossible to do justice to this work and be very brief. My summary does leave out many parts of Habermas argument especially with the tradition of Sociology. But hopefully the key arguments are rendered faithfully for common edification. |
||
[[User:Szczels|Szczels]] ([[User talk:Szczels|talk]]) |
[[User:Szczels|Szczels]] ([[User talk:Szczels|talk]]) <small>—Preceding [[Wikipedia:Signatures|comment]] was added at 11:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)</small><!--Template:Undated--> <!--Autosigned by SineBot--> |
||
Revision as of 11:21, 16 May 2008
 | Books Unassessed | ||||||
| |||||||
This summary was widely checked out in the process of writing my thesis at the Royal College of Art, London - doctoral thesis (2002) 'Exploding Cinema 1992 - 1999, culture and democracy' by Stefan Szczelkun. Copy available in the RCA library and from the British Library. Abridged for Wikipedia by the author. Full text online.
It may seem long for a Wikipedia entry but I argue that the two volumes of TCA are also very long and densely argued and it is impossible to do justice to this work and be very brief. My summary does leave out many parts of Habermas argument especially with the tradition of Sociology. But hopefully the key arguments are rendered faithfully for common edification. Szczels (talk) —Preceding comment was added at 11:20, 16 May 2008 (UTC)