Wikipedia:Peer review/Stephen Short/archive1: Difference between revisions
Content deleted Content added
←Created page with '{{subst:PR/subst}} {{Peer review page|topic=}} I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards wh...' |
Linking to semi-automated peer review (bot task 2) |
||
| Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
Please do not use level 1-3 section headings or horizontal rules in this peer review. Please do not include any images, such as done/not done templates with tick/cross graphics, and do not paste in semi-automated peer reviews below: link to them instead. Peer review pages should not be moved. |
||
--> |
--> |
||
* A script has been used to generate a semi-[[User:AndyZ/peerreviewer|automated]] review of the article for issues relating to grammar and [[WP:MOS|house]] style; it can be found on the [[Wikipedia:Peer review/Automated/May 2008#Stephen Short|automated peer review page]] for May 2008. [[Category:Peer review pages with semiautomated peer reviews]] |
|||
{{Peer review page|topic=}} |
{{Peer review page|topic=}} |
||
I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards whoever wrote it. By looking at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Short&action=history|history] one can tell that [[User:ManbirS]] has some relation to this person, and his edit history is deeply suspicious of promotional activity. |
I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards whoever wrote it. By looking at the [http://en.wikipedia.org/enwiki/w/index.php?title=Stephen_Short&action=history|history] one can tell that [[User:ManbirS]] has some relation to this person, and his edit history is deeply suspicious of promotional activity. |
||
Revision as of 22:40, 17 May 2008
- A script has been used to generate a semi-automated review of the article for issues relating to grammar and house style; it can be found on the automated peer review page for May 2008.
I came across this page and noticed that it is written as an autobiography and seems to be very... slanted towards whoever wrote it. By looking at the [1] one can tell that User:ManbirS has some relation to this person, and his edit history is deeply suspicious of promotional activity.
That's not to say promotional activity is entirely bad; They do work that adds to the encyclopedia, but it seems to be the information being added isn't exactly unbiased.
That is why I am flagging this article for a PR.
Thanks, Jeff (talk) 04:58, 16 May 2008 (UTC)