Decline to State: Difference between revisions
Highground79 (talk | contribs) removed incorrect info about registration, different methods are used in different states many states do not have registration by party |
Lincolnite (talk | contribs) changed tense and removed repetitious section |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
In February [[1999]], 12.89% of registered voters in California declined to state a party affiliation. By January [[2006]], that figure had risen to 18.18%. The growth of the category Decline to State follows California's switch from the [[closed primary]] to an [[open primary]] system in [[1996]] following the adoption of [[Proposition 198]]. Until 1996, only [[voter]]s who were registered with a political party could vote in that party's primary election. In the June 1998 and March 2000 [[primary elections]], voters could vote for any candidate in any party's primary. |
In February [[1999]], 12.89% of registered voters in California declined to state a party affiliation. By January [[2006]], that figure had risen to 18.18%. The growth of the category Decline to State follows California's switch from the [[closed primary]] to an [[open primary]] system in [[1996]] following the adoption of [[Proposition 198]]. Until 1996, only [[voter]]s who were registered with a political party could vote in that party's primary election. In the June 1998 and March 2000 [[primary elections]], voters could vote for any candidate in any party's primary. |
||
On June 26, [[2000]], the [[United States Supreme Court]] decided in ''California Democratic Party, et al. v. Jones'' 530 U.S. 567 (2000) [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-401.ZS.html] that California's open primary system violated the right of free association. In January [[2001]], following the passage of SB28 (Ch. 898, Stats. 2000), a new modified closed system took effect in which voters registered with a particular party can only vote in that party's primary, but voters who decline to state a party affiliation can vote in one party's primary if the party agrees to allow it (California Elections Code §2151) |
On June 26, [[2000]], the [[United States Supreme Court]] decided in ''California Democratic Party, et al. v. Jones'' 530 U.S. 567 (2000) [http://www.law.cornell.edu/supct/html/99-401.ZS.html] that California's open primary system violated the right of free association. In January [[2001]], following the passage of SB28 (Ch. 898, Stats. 2000), a new modified closed system took effect in which voters registered with a particular party can only vote in that party's primary, but voters who decline to state a party affiliation can vote in one party's primary if the party agrees to allow it (California Elections Code §2151). |
||
The [[ |
The [[Democratic Party (United States)|Democratic]] and [[Republican Party (United States)|Republican]] parties have allowed voters who decline to state a party affiliation to vote in all of their respective primary elections until the 2008 presidential primary election, when DTS could vote in the Democratic Party primary if they asked for a Democratic ballot while they could not opt for a Republican ballot. |
||
==External links== |
==External links== |
||
Revision as of 11:27, 19 May 2008
Decline To State (DTS) is an affiliation designation on the California voter registration form that allows voters to register to vote without choosing a party affiliation. It is similar to what in other states would be called declaring oneself as an independent. Although the term independent is often used to designate DTS voters, that term invites confusion with the American Independent Party.
In February 1999, 12.89% of registered voters in California declined to state a party affiliation. By January 2006, that figure had risen to 18.18%. The growth of the category Decline to State follows California's switch from the closed primary to an open primary system in 1996 following the adoption of Proposition 198. Until 1996, only voters who were registered with a political party could vote in that party's primary election. In the June 1998 and March 2000 primary elections, voters could vote for any candidate in any party's primary.
On June 26, 2000, the United States Supreme Court decided in California Democratic Party, et al. v. Jones 530 U.S. 567 (2000) [1] that California's open primary system violated the right of free association. In January 2001, following the passage of SB28 (Ch. 898, Stats. 2000), a new modified closed system took effect in which voters registered with a particular party can only vote in that party's primary, but voters who decline to state a party affiliation can vote in one party's primary if the party agrees to allow it (California Elections Code §2151).
The Democratic and Republican parties have allowed voters who decline to state a party affiliation to vote in all of their respective primary elections until the 2008 presidential primary election, when DTS could vote in the Democratic Party primary if they asked for a Democratic ballot while they could not opt for a Republican ballot.