User talk:Gatra: Difference between revisions
5ju989nfhs50 (talk | contribs) Notification: Speedy deletion nomination of Ciputra Development. (TW) |
JarrahTree (talk | contribs) /huh? |
||
| Line 14: | Line 14: | ||
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Ciputra Development|the page]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[{{{targettalk|Talk:Ciputra Development}}}|the article's talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:Pgagnon999|Pgagnon999]] ([[User talk:Pgagnon999|talk]]) 05:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> |
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding <code>{{tl|hangon}}</code> to '''the top of [[:Ciputra Development|the page]]''' (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on '''[[{{{targettalk|Talk:Ciputra Development}}}|the article's talk page]]''' explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for ''speedy'' deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. [[User:Pgagnon999|Pgagnon999]] ([[User talk:Pgagnon999|talk]]) 05:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)<!-- Template:Db-spam-notice --> <!-- Template:Db-csd-notice-custom --> |
||
==protects== |
|||
Hi there is nothing on your user or talk page to say you are an admin - so whats with protecting articles? Thought only admins could do that ? No edit summaries are being given, and there are not necessarily any signs of explanation as to whty or what you are doing - it would be worth explaining - in view of the issues that arise from this - cheers [[User:SatuSuro|Satu]][[User talk:SatuSuro|Suro]] 08:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC) |
|||
Revision as of 08:27, 20 May 2008
Welcome!
Hello, Gatra, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and ask your question there. Again, welcome! Seraphimblade 05:41, 12 January 2007 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Ciputra Development
A tag has been placed on Ciputra Development, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pgagnon999 (talk) 05:34, 23 January 2008 (UTC)
protects
Hi there is nothing on your user or talk page to say you are an admin - so whats with protecting articles? Thought only admins could do that ? No edit summaries are being given, and there are not necessarily any signs of explanation as to whty or what you are doing - it would be worth explaining - in view of the issues that arise from this - cheers SatuSuro 08:27, 20 May 2008 (UTC)