Jump to content

Talk:Jenny Schecter: Difference between revisions

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Content deleted Content added
Donnabella (talk | contribs)
refined reqphoto/need-image using AWB
Line 1: Line 1:
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}}
{{LGBTProject | class=Start}}
{{reqphoto}}
{{reqphoto|people}}


shouldnt someone put her second and third season?
shouldnt someone put her second and third season?

Revision as of 13:31, 24 May 2008

WikiProject iconLGBTQ+ studies Start‑class
WikiProject iconThis article is of interest to WikiProject LGBTQ+ studies, which tries to ensure comprehensive and factual coverage of all LGBTQ-related issues on Wikipedia. For more information, or to get involved, please visit the project page or contribute to the discussion.
StartThis article has been rated as Start-class on Wikipedia's content assessment scale.

shouldnt someone put her second and third season?

Although Jenny's storyline is far more rich in the first season, part of the storyline involving those seasons has been added to the article. The fourth season should also be added. However, one should wait and see how it develops as there isn't much to say about her so far in it. --TLW 08:02, 19 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Donnabella posted this question under Jenny's Chart thumbnail:

Didn't they have an awkward foreplay in the first season after which they mutually agreed that they were an awful match?

In fact, they did. But someone argued in Dana's article discussion page that they should not be connected because they didn't have anything. I was just making clear that the connection is based on the fact that 1) Jenny and Dana were connected on the Chart displayed at the end of episode 3.12 and 2) Jenny herself commented about the awkward hookup in episode 3.11. --TLW 04:27, 27 February 2007 (UTC).[reply]
By heteronormative standards, that someone in the Dana Talk page (which I couldn't find, btw) is absolutely right. None of their friends seemed aware of it without Jenny's comment. Donnabella 22:51, 28 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]
OK... I'll upload the chart for you within this talk page --TLW 03:21, 2 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]
--TLW 03:59, 2 March 2007 (UTC).[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Jenny 800x600.jpg

Image:Jenny 800x600.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.

BetacommandBot 23:16, 13 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Any stats on the anti-Jenny lobby?

In the special features for the Season 4 DVDs, a lot of the fan writers mention identifying with Jenny, with two disclaimers: 1) she's a writer, and 2) even though all (*asterisk) the fans hate her. I'm also wondering how much Jenny is an alter ego of Ilene Chaiken? Factually there are some important differences (Jenny Schechter never worked on Fresh Prince) but as far as personality? Donnabella (talk) 00:55, 20 January 2008 (UTC)[reply]